Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
Dee said:Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
I wasn't talking about Darren Wilson. I understand he was investigated "six ways from Saturday" and probably by intensely biased groups, but hey, whatever, that's the way this government runs. In any case, that avenue is closed. But someone in the department allowed the racist practices and someone needs to pay for it. Obviously, that won't be Wilson, who I never mentioned in the first place, but I guarantee you nothing will happen in any case.
TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
I wasn't talking about Darren Wilson. I understand he was investigated "six ways from Saturday" and probably by intensely biased groups, but hey, whatever, that's the way this government runs. In any case, that avenue is closed. But someone in the department allowed the racist practices and someone needs to pay for it. Obviously, that won't be Wilson, who I never mentioned in the first place, but I guarantee you nothing will happen in any case.
Going after the the very people committing the crimes is a racist practice? Hell, just asking that question is racist now.
Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
I wasn't talking about Darren Wilson. I understand he was investigated "six ways from Saturday" and probably by intensely biased groups, but hey, whatever, that's the way this government runs. In any case, that avenue is closed. But someone in the department allowed the racist practices and someone needs to pay for it. Obviously, that won't be Wilson, who I never mentioned in the first place, but I guarantee you nothing will happen in any case.
Going after the the very people committing the crimes is a racist practice? Hell, just asking that question is racist now.
This is the exact mind set that stalls us from actually making any progress; a refusal to acknowledge that in some or many cases, racism is what drives a lot of people still, be it teachers, doctors, realtors, and yes... gasp! Even police.
http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2014...illion-dollars-buying-power-putting-good-use/[font='Playfair Display', times, serif]African Americans Have $1.1 Trillion in Buying Power, Are We Putting Our Money to Good Use?[/font]
http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2014...illion-dollars-buying-power-putting-good-use/
http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2014/02/african-americans-1-1-trillion-dollars-buying-power-putting-good-use/
TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
I wasn't talking about Darren Wilson. I understand he was investigated "six ways from Saturday" and probably by intensely biased groups, but hey, whatever, that's the way this government runs. In any case, that avenue is closed. But someone in the department allowed the racist practices and someone needs to pay for it. Obviously, that won't be Wilson, who I never mentioned in the first place, but I guarantee you nothing will happen in any case.
Going after the the very people committing the crimes is a racist practice? Hell, just asking that question is racist now.
This is the exact mind set that stalls us from actually making any progress; a refusal to acknowledge that in some or many cases, racism is what drives a lot of people still, be it teachers, doctors, realtors, and yes... gasp! Even police.
Stalling us from making progress? I do not even understand that comment. For gods sakes we have a black president only because whites decided to vote for him. We have black people in all aspects of federal and local government in every state. Interracial marriages and relationships are common place and overwhelmingly excepted by Americans. Blacks are more successful and rich then ever before because racism is rare and they have the freedom to become wealthy.
Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
I wasn't talking about Darren Wilson. I understand he was investigated "six ways from Saturday" and probably by intensely biased groups, but hey, whatever, that's the way this government runs. In any case, that avenue is closed. But someone in the department allowed the racist practices and someone needs to pay for it. Obviously, that won't be Wilson, who I never mentioned in the first place, but I guarantee you nothing will happen in any case.
Going after the the very people committing the crimes is a racist practice? Hell, just asking that question is racist now.
This is the exact mind set that stalls us from actually making any progress; a refusal to acknowledge that in some or many cases, racism is what drives a lot of people still, be it teachers, doctors, realtors, and yes... gasp! Even police.
Stalling us from making progress? I do not even understand that comment. For gods sakes we have a black president only because whites decided to vote for him. We have black people in all aspects of federal and local government in every state. Interracial marriages and relationships are common place and overwhelmingly excepted by Americans. Blacks are more successful and rich then ever before because racism is rare and they have the freedom to become wealthy.
And yet it was white people questioning his ethnicity and the legitimacy of his birth in the U.S., claiming he must've been middle eastern or something horrible lyke dem turrists Bush warned them about! Simply voting in a black president doesn't mean shit when there have been quite a few instances of racism in the news all throughout the country. The only thing it may mean is, yeah, we are making small steps, but considering the kinds of and immense changes we've made otherwise, it's hard to believe the amount of ignorance, racism, prejudice, and downright hate we still see today.
TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
I wasn't talking about Darren Wilson. I understand he was investigated "six ways from Saturday" and probably by intensely biased groups, but hey, whatever, that's the way this government runs. In any case, that avenue is closed. But someone in the department allowed the racist practices and someone needs to pay for it. Obviously, that won't be Wilson, who I never mentioned in the first place, but I guarantee you nothing will happen in any case.
Going after the the very people committing the crimes is a racist practice? Hell, just asking that question is racist now.
This is the exact mind set that stalls us from actually making any progress; a refusal to acknowledge that in some or many cases, racism is what drives a lot of people still, be it teachers, doctors, realtors, and yes... gasp! Even police.
Stalling us from making progress? I do not even understand that comment. For gods sakes we have a black president only because whites decided to vote for him. We have black people in all aspects of federal and local government in every state. Interracial marriages and relationships are common place and overwhelmingly excepted by Americans. Blacks are more successful and rich then ever before because racism is rare and they have the freedom to become wealthy.
And yet it was white people questioning his ethnicity and the legitimacy of his birth in the U.S., claiming he must've been middle eastern or something horrible lyke dem turrists Bush warned them about! Simply voting in a black president doesn't mean shit when there have been quite a few instances of racism in the news all throughout the country. The only thing it may mean is, yeah, we are making small steps, but considering the kinds of and immense changes we've made otherwise, it's hard to believe the amount of ignorance, racism, prejudice, and downright hate we still see today.
People like me are questioning the man on what you mentioned above because of facts and who he is not because of color.
Please! They go after obama no less then all other presidents because of his policies not because the easy out of it all being about race. It is a tired and pathetic excuse anymore.
Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
I wasn't talking about Darren Wilson. I understand he was investigated "six ways from Saturday" and probably by intensely biased groups, but hey, whatever, that's the way this government runs. In any case, that avenue is closed. But someone in the department allowed the racist practices and someone needs to pay for it. Obviously, that won't be Wilson, who I never mentioned in the first place, but I guarantee you nothing will happen in any case.
Going after the the very people committing the crimes is a racist practice? Hell, just asking that question is racist now.
This is the exact mind set that stalls us from actually making any progress; a refusal to acknowledge that in some or many cases, racism is what drives a lot of people still, be it teachers, doctors, realtors, and yes... gasp! Even police.
Stalling us from making progress? I do not even understand that comment. For gods sakes we have a black president only because whites decided to vote for him. We have black people in all aspects of federal and local government in every state. Interracial marriages and relationships are common place and overwhelmingly excepted by Americans. Blacks are more successful and rich then ever before because racism is rare and they have the freedom to become wealthy.
And yet it was white people questioning his ethnicity and the legitimacy of his birth in the U.S., claiming he must've been middle eastern or something horrible lyke dem turrists Bush warned them about! Simply voting in a black president doesn't mean shit when there have been quite a few instances of racism in the news all throughout the country. The only thing it may mean is, yeah, we are making small steps, but considering the kinds of and immense changes we've made otherwise, it's hard to believe the amount of ignorance, racism, prejudice, and downright hate we still see today.
People like me are questioning the man on what you mentioned above because of facts and who he is not because of color.
Please! They go after obama no less then all other presidents because of his policies not because the easy out of it all being about race. It is a tired and pathetic excuse anymore.
What, the fact that he was born in a state belonging to the USA? Right. I understand that they go after him for his policies, but quite a bit of it was driven purely by the color of his skin. The question, "Where does he come from?" and "let's provide proof!" is a round about way of saying we don't trust this guy EVEN BEFORE he had a chance to get into office.
TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:Dee said:Webster said:Dee said:The biggest problem is, though, that someone got off Scott free and no one--for now--is going to pay for the wrongdoings against certain races.
Whoa, whoa, whoa...when did Darren Wilson get-off scot-free? The St. Louis Co. Grand Jury investigated him six ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict, the Justice Dept. investigated him seven ways from Saturday and couldn't find enough evidence to indict either...or does it only apply under certain circumstances?![]()
I wasn't talking about Darren Wilson. I understand he was investigated "six ways from Saturday" and probably by intensely biased groups, but hey, whatever, that's the way this government runs. In any case, that avenue is closed. But someone in the department allowed the racist practices and someone needs to pay for it. Obviously, that won't be Wilson, who I never mentioned in the first place, but I guarantee you nothing will happen in any case.
Going after the the very people committing the crimes is a racist practice? Hell, just asking that question is racist now.
This is the exact mind set that stalls us from actually making any progress; a refusal to acknowledge that in some or many cases, racism is what drives a lot of people still, be it teachers, doctors, realtors, and yes... gasp! Even police.
Stalling us from making progress? I do not even understand that comment. For gods sakes we have a black president only because whites decided to vote for him. We have black people in all aspects of federal and local government in every state. Interracial marriages and relationships are common place and overwhelmingly excepted by Americans. Blacks are more successful and rich then ever before because racism is rare and they have the freedom to become wealthy.
And yet it was white people questioning his ethnicity and the legitimacy of his birth in the U.S., claiming he must've been middle eastern or something horrible lyke dem turrists Bush warned them about! Simply voting in a black president doesn't mean shit when there have been quite a few instances of racism in the news all throughout the country. The only thing it may mean is, yeah, we are making small steps, but considering the kinds of and immense changes we've made otherwise, it's hard to believe the amount of ignorance, racism, prejudice, and downright hate we still see today.
People like me are questioning the man on what you mentioned above because of facts and who he is not because of color.
Please! They go after obama no less then all other presidents because of his policies not because the easy out of it all being about race. It is a tired and pathetic excuse anymore.
What, the fact that he was born in a state belonging to the USA? Right. I understand that they go after him for his policies, but quite a bit of it was driven purely by the color of his skin. The question, "Where does he come from?" and "let's provide proof!" is a round about way of saying we don't trust this guy EVEN BEFORE he had a chance to get into office.
The fact he is not natural born American yes has nothing to do with race. Again it is what he believes that is in question not race. What I despise and hate about the man so much is what he believes but it is such a easy out to try and shut down people who also do not like what he stands for. Again it is truly pathetic.
TRUE LIBERTY said:I said he is not a natural born American. I never said he was not born on American soil. Big difference.
Dee said:TRUE LIBERTY said:I said he is not a natural born American. I never said he was not born on American soil. Big difference.
I get that, but it still doesn't matter to me. Technically, a good number of our ancestors, if you want to go back far enough, came from entirely different countries. That logic to me is both a double-standard and hypocritical.