Gen McChrystal relieved of command

[DrLeftover]

Like it or not, McChrystal did NOT have First Amendment freedom to criticize the Commander in Chief while speaking as a US Army General.



But still, Obama should not have relieved him of command for doing so.



He was just answering a question with his honest opinion.



Would WE the citizens of the country rather that he lie about his views of the President?

 

[nolvorite]

of course he had to be relieved because he probably won't follow the President's commands when the soldiers are in some kind of desperate situation

 

[ThaBawse]

I believe it's time to shove the question When will this war be over and won? down Obama's throat.

 

[Nebulous's iconNebulous]

Like it or not, McChrystal did NOT have First Amendment freedom to criticize the Commander in Chief while speaking as a US Army General.



But still, Obama should not have relieved him of command for doing so.



He was just answering a question with his honest opinion.



Would WE the citizens of the country rather that he lie about his views of the President?

If my employee's had a problem with me, they should take it up with me themselves and not go telling the whole world.

 

[IcarusForde]

If my employee's had a problem with me, they should take it up with me themselves and not go telling the whole world.

That.