Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
Nebulous said:Yes.
Right now all we have to go on is what they are telling us. For all we know, they could have him alive some where and are torturing him right now.. Pumping him for information and whatnot.
I want to believe they killed him and I think they did but proof would be great & it would put all the conspiracy theories to rest.
Jughead said:Osama Bin Laden's wife said that they killed her husband. What more proof do you need? lol I personally don't need proof but I really don't see the problem with giving the public a photo either. I'm on the fence about this, because I don't need proof, but to all the nonbelievers I wouldn't mind them getting their own confirmation.
MIKE MALLOY: I have heard some commentators talk about the fact that, all the lives that have been lost in this war on terror, and now the summary execution of the person responsible. But as soon as I heard that, I thought, well, bin Laden really didn't have anything to do -- did he? -- with Iraq. And I think his only relationship with Afghanistan was geographical.
But Iraq -- all the death in Iraq was not caused by bin Laden. The death in Iraq was caused by George W. Bush. Five thousand Americans, tens of thousands permanently damaged and shot to pieces, a million Iraqis dead -- that wasn't bin Laden. That was George Bush. So when does Seal Unit 6, or whatever it's called, drop in on George Bush? Bush was responsible for a lot more death, innocent death, than bin Laden. Wasn't he, or am I wrong here?