I like it and fully support it.
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion
Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
The Wave To Wave Theory. When Does Life Begin?
- Thread starter WHO IS SERAFIN
- Start date
Sinon said:
And that would be supporting cold blooded murder.
So be it. If a pregnancy occurred for me and I knew I would be incapable of coping with it, I would terminate it without a second thought.
Shortly after my boyfriend broke up with me, I had a pregnancy scare. Turned out I wasn't, but it was worrying nonetheless, because I was in no mental condition whatsoever to be a single parent. Sure, if I had been pregnant I'd have come across the whole "why not carry it and then have it adopted" argument. But there are already thousands upon thousands of kids dumped in adoption homes, and they're forced to think every day that their mother didn't want them, and that's hurtful. So rather than do that (which would also increase taxation in order to fund the homes, which I imagine you would dislike) I'd rather switch the whole thing off.
And, let's be honest. In what capacity do you have the right to tell me what I can and cannot do with a part of my body which, for approximately half of the pregnancy, is nothing more than an appendix that sucks nutrients out of me?
Shortly after my boyfriend broke up with me, I had a pregnancy scare. Turned out I wasn't, but it was worrying nonetheless, because I was in no mental condition whatsoever to be a single parent. Sure, if I had been pregnant I'd have come across the whole "why not carry it and then have it adopted" argument. But there are already thousands upon thousands of kids dumped in adoption homes, and they're forced to think every day that their mother didn't want them, and that's hurtful. So rather than do that (which would also increase taxation in order to fund the homes, which I imagine you would dislike) I'd rather switch the whole thing off.
And, let's be honest. In what capacity do you have the right to tell me what I can and cannot do with a part of my body which, for approximately half of the pregnancy, is nothing more than an appendix that sucks nutrients out of me?
And that would be no different if someone walked up to a baby in a crib and stuck a icepik in it's brain.
We have no right until as the video says it becomes a life. After that it has every bit of rights to live like you and me. Easy solution if you don't want that risk to happen is don't have sex.
We have no right until as the video says it becomes a life. After that it has every bit of rights to live like you and me. Easy solution if you don't want that risk to happen is don't have sex.
Everyone's ideas of when life begins is different, and I support abortions up to a certain point. When a fetus had a chance of surviving out of the womb, it gets hairier considering it would be fine to continue developing on its own.
IMO, the wave to wave theory is nothing more than an attempt to set a standard for when life truly begins. We have the standard for death, when brainwaves stop. It makes perfect sense to me to use that same standard to judge when life begins, when brainwaves start.
Jazzy said:
I would give a like for that response but it seems to be missing.
Similar threads
