Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
I agree with what you're saying, except that I do not agree that GMO foods are a necessary progression at all. Hybridization and grafting are one thing: we have more new apple varieties 'than you can shake a stick at' ( ) due to hybridization and grafting .....GMO is going too far IMO...don't need it.Reduction in the number of genetically modified foods would be a start, but as that's more of a necessity thing, I don't see that happening. Also a less sedentary average lifestyle, though how you enforce that is beyond me.
I agree with what you're saying, except that I do not agree that GMO foods are a necessary progression at all. Hybridization and grafting are one thing: we have more new apple varieties 'than you can shake a stick at' ( ) due to hybridization and grafting .....GMO is going too far IMO...don't need it.
"Let them eat apples!"
That certainly is a prevalent argument; of course highly debatable I think. Maybe we could start with our highly screwed up distribution systems and our national preponderance for food waste.sn't GMO in America a product of needing to feed a population for which the non-GMO/organic/real foods cannot cover?
True, very true.
Back to diabetes, though......sugar! Kids and young adults especially are loaded up with so much totally unnecessary sugar; stands to reason that we'd be a whole lot healthier as a nation without so much sugar.True, very true.