We can't definitely say that AI generated art, music and literature are not pushing boundaries. They actually are! And that is to show the creativity in machines. AI can process large amounts of data very quickly, but can it truly create something that is genuine or original? This raises a lot of questions, right? What's your take on this?
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion
Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
Can AI Truly be Creative?
- Thread starter flower
- Start date
I think AI is the best gift that mankind has created. I find that a lot of people just hate on it because they don't like the idea of being outdone by a machine. I think art is very subjective. I'm not going to stop enjoying what a machine creates just because a few people claim it's not art.
It all depends on the aspect on how AI is being used, especially considering the fact that it comes from other website’s data when it hits the machine.
However, if you train it correctly to use your own voice, then it becomes unique.
What data is used to train an AI, where does it come from, and who owns it?
Artificial intelligence (AI) relies on large amounts of data. Machine learning algorithms learn to find inter-dependencies and patterns amongst data sets and apply those learnings to any new data it is presented with.
www.potterclarkson.com
Machine Writing vs. The Human Touch: An In-Depth Look at AI-Generated Content
Discover how AI-generated content works along with the pros and cons of using AI writing tools for your content creation strategy.
www.theblogsmith.com
If it is actually being creative, isn't that a form of self-expression, and if it is expressing itself, then it must have a self to express, and therefore, it could well be sentient, and be a life form.
When it comes to art and technology, people usually dismiss the technology when it’s new until people learn how to utilize its potential in creative ways. I know with music, people hated synthesizers because they feared it would displace “real” musicians and people complained digital recordings sounded stale and so on. Now it’s just a vocal minority and the old school way of doing things is done as a stylistic instead of being the “true” way of doing things.
The old way didn’t get completely replaced.
The old way didn’t get completely replaced.
Yes.
But Stevie Wonder's synthesizer wasn't making plans to take over the world.
But... maybe... His was:
Last edited:
