Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion
Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
Abortion
- Thread starter Cory
- Start date
It's not murder if it's done early. At this stage, the fetus is just a clump of cells with no feelings or thoughts. It should be up to the person carrying the fetus if they wish to get an abortion or not, and the fact that Roe Vs Wade was removed is disgusting. The government should have no say in medical decisions for anyone! These decisions should only be between the people involved and their doctors full stop.
It is a murder. If nobody does anything it will grow up to be a baby. It's not like a process that didn't start yet so we can be okay, nothing is going on. But the process of development is ongoing and stopping in the early phase is same as stopping it in any other phase.
If you start the fire in the forest and don't prevent it right away, it will burn down the whole forest because the process is ongoing. In the same way if you decide not to abort, you will 90% chance give a birth. So, there is no such thing as "It is not a murder".
Women want to escape responsibility for their poor choices in life. And how so that if woman doesn't want a child, it is okay to abort even tough a guy wants that child. But when woman wants a child and a guy doesn't, he is forced to take care of the child. Double standards.
If you start the fire in the forest and don't prevent it right away, it will burn down the whole forest because the process is ongoing. In the same way if you decide not to abort, you will 90% chance give a birth. So, there is no such thing as "It is not a murder".
Women want to escape responsibility for their poor choices in life. And how so that if woman doesn't want a child, it is okay to abort even tough a guy wants that child. But when woman wants a child and a guy doesn't, he is forced to take care of the child. Double standards.
Are you saying it's murder any time a man ejaculates into a napkin? Those were potential kids 🤔
There is a big difference from a fertilized egg to an actual embryo.
It takes two to tangle.
I do agree with this though. The double standards are ridiculous. However, her body her choice
If a man does not want kids, don't do the act that creates them.I knew it you will use that argument but sadly for you, it is a bad one. Fertilized egg is an ongoing process, ejaculated sperm is not a process of something happening from which life will happen, they initiated absolutely nothing.
Except that sperm is living. Your analogy makes it murder
The egg the woman carry aren't living.
Sperm is living and yet it's not in the place where it can make life while when it is in the egg, the life is going to happen. I don't know what makes you not see this. Maybe too much of propaganda got into you, which is not a surprise coming from a west, and mostly Canada where they support transgender agenda.Except that sperm is living. Your analogy makes it murder
The egg the woman carry aren't living.
Similar threads
