What's new

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Join Our Facebook Page Today!

Join the conversation and help spread the word about offtopix on Facebook! Your voice matters—let’s make an impact together!

Join Our X.com Page Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on X.com! Your voice is powerful, and together, we can create meaningful change!

Join offtopix Discord Server Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on Discord! Your voice holds incredible power, and together, we can create impactful change!

Feminist declares ISIS videos fake

Princess Alexandros XVII said:
Is there such a thing as a meninist? Y'know, someone fighting for male rights. Because there are rights that women have which men don't, which means neither males nor females are equal.

Come to think of it, why not scrap feminism and pick something less egocentric? "Equalism" perhaps. 100% equality between genders, races, everything. Woman hits you? You hit her right back.

Equality goes both ways, and feminism generally seems to forget that.

very true... 100% agree...
 
Princess Alexandros XVII said:
Is there such a thing as a meninist? Y'know, someone fighting for male rights. Because there are rights that women have which men don't, which means neither males nor females are equal.

Come to think of it, why not scrap feminism and pick something less egocentric? "Equalism" perhaps. 100% equality between genders, races, everything. Woman hits you? You hit her right back.

Equality goes both ways, and feminism generally seems to forget that.



Sounds good to me but with todays radical feminists me saying I would never hit a woman back unless my life was in real danger would probably make me a chauvinist pig.
 
Princess Alexandros XVII said:
Is there such a thing as a meninist? Y'know, someone fighting for male rights. Because there are rights that women have which men don't, which means neither males nor females are equal.

Come to think of it, why not scrap feminism and pick something less egocentric? "Equalism" perhaps. 100% equality between genders, races, everything. Woman hits you? You hit her right back.

Equality goes both ways, and feminism generally seems to forget that.



Sounds good to me but with todays radical feminists me saying I would never hit a woman back unless my life was in real danger would probably make me a chauvinist pig.
 
Notes from The Glossary to help the discussion.

Misogyny, Misogynistic
Irrational and pathological hatred of women by a person of either sex. Also the putting of said hate into practice. The word is often misused in the mass media to describe even a casual affront to a woman or feminine traits. The opposite is Philogyny, being irrationally devoted to women. Misandry is the equivalent hatred of men. Note: MISOGYNY is the correct spelling.


Philogyny
Being in absolute adoration of women. Philandry is the equivalent fondness for men. See: Misogyny.


Link available to source upon Adult request.
 
Smooth said:
Princess Alexandros XVII said:
there are rights that women have which men don't,

Such as?

The default custodial parent in divorce cases involve minor children.

The ability to decide whether or not consensual sex was actually a crime the next day.

The inborn right to change their mind once they've made "a final decision" without question.

The privilege of having "feelings" when in a business situation.

how's that for a start?
 
DrLeftover said:
Smooth said:
Princess Alexandros XVII said:
there are rights that women have which men don't,

Such as?

The default custodial parent in divorce cases involve minor children.

The ability to decide whether or not consensual sex was actually a crime the next day.

The inborn right to change their mind once they've made "a final decision" without question.

The privilege of having "feelings" when in a business situation.

how's that for a start?

what about the draft?

i believe it's only the force of males to this date...
 
DrLeftover said:
Smooth said:
Princess Alexandros XVII said:
there are rights that women have which men don't,

Such as?

The default custodial parent in divorce cases involve minor children.

The ability to decide whether or not consensual sex was actually a crime the next day.

The inborn right to change their mind once they've made "a final decision" without question.

The privilege of having "feelings" when in a business situation.

how's that for a start?

Additionally, in most cases maternity leave is 12 months. On the flipside, the father only gets 6 months for their paternity leave.

Female children are also completely legally protected from genital mutilation. Anything down there is safe unless you plan on breaking the law somehow. But circumcising a little boy? Fuck it, legal.

There's also the whole domestic violence thing. Guy beats girl? Asshole, horrible person, should be locked up. Girl beats guy? Suck it up you pussy. etc.

Compulsory military service, women are exempt.

There's also a belief (which I feel is warranted) that men receive harsher sentences in criminal courts.
 
+Justice said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
DarkFury said:
DrLeftover said:
but but but....


she LOVES Mr. Obama....

05/25/2011

...
What is leadership? Leadership means getting out in front of where people are and waking them up. Right now, given these violent possible threats to us and our families, we are sleeping.

Which is why I am formally coming out of the closet with my support for Senator Barack Obama. Of all the candidates running now, he is the leader on understanding the threat to the Constitution and actually taking action, not just mouthing soundbites, on the need to deny torturers space in our nation and to restore the rule of law.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/why-barack-obama-got-my-v_1_b_89017.html

That woman is a free range lunatic.

That would go for most Feminists.

i think you're a lunatic thinking that people that support the rights and equality of woman are lunatics... i'm sure your wife supports equality and woman's rights, no? if she does maybe you should go up to her and call her a lunatic because of it... ;)

I think you're a lunatic thinking that he's a lunatic for thinking that feminazis are lunatics. From what I can see feminism in America is a bunch of misandrist, ignorant virgins who think vaginal sex is rape and bitch about men opressing them by looking at their asses. Feminism is not about equality, it's about WOMEN's issues. Egalitarianism is the right term for equality.
 
feminism is the word for the support of equality and for woman's rights... anything beyond that then the word changes... egalitarianism is the more of a trend of thought that favors equality for all people...
 
If feminism supports equality between men and women why is it named after one 'estranged' party? Does that make any sense to you? I support equality but why should a movement that is supposedly ALL ABOUT equality be named after one gender? It shouldn't! And that's why it's not about equality, it's about WOMEN and WOMEN's issues. And if I'm against sexism why would I support a group about one gender's issues and rights? Doesn't it make more sense to support a movement that really is about equality? In our society sexism goes both ways, it just works differently. So I don't need to support a movement that doesn't acknowledge that fact and only focuses on the rights of ONE gender.
 
Damian said:
If feminism supports equality between men and women why is it named after one 'estranged' party? Does that make any sense to you? I support equality but why should a movement that is supposedly ALL ABOUT equality be named after one gender? It shouldn't! And that's why it's not about equality, it's about WOMEN and WOMEN's issues. And if I'm against sexism why would I support a group about one gender's issues and rights? Doesn't it make more sense to support a movement that really is about equality? In our society sexism goes both ways, it just works differently. So I don't need to support a movement that doesn't acknowledge that fact and only focuses on the rights of ONE gender.

Genius!
 
Damian said:
If feminism supports equality between men and women why is it named after one 'estranged' party? Does that make any sense to you? I support equality but why should a movement that is supposedly ALL ABOUT equality be named after one gender? It shouldn't! And that's why it's not about equality, it's about WOMEN and WOMEN's issues. And if I'm against sexism why would I support a group about one gender's issues and rights? Doesn't it make more sense to support a movement that really is about equality? In our society sexism goes both ways, it just works differently. So I don't need to support a movement that doesn't acknowledge that fact and only focuses on the rights of ONE gender.

it's just the word that was created for such, feminism is more if an individual or a group that supports woman's rights... feminism is not just in the united states... there's feminism in countries that have little or no rights for women and they are trying to get people on board that equality of genders should be the answer... women started to protest, demanded equality... just how minorities did here in the usa...

if you don't want to support something then don't, no one is making you...
 
As with many of these sorts of "movements", they do not want, nor will they accept, "Equal Treatment Under The Law", they are after "Preferential Treatment...." so they are 'given points' in hiring, excluded from tests of qualification, given special status or pay, etc.

Which is not what is meant by.

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv
 

Create an account or login to post a reply

You must be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Create an account here on Off Topix. It's quick & easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Theme customizations unavailable!

    Theme customization fields are not available to you, please contact the administrator for more information.

  • Choose the color combination that reflects your taste
    Background images
    Color gradient backgrounds
Back