What's new

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Join Our Facebook Page Today!

Join the conversation and help spread the word about offtopix on Facebook! Your voice matters—let’s make an impact together!

Join Our X.com Page Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on X.com! Your voice is powerful, and together, we can create meaningful change!

Join offtopix Discord Server Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on Discord! Your voice holds incredible power, and together, we can create impactful change!

Girl Tased in South Dakota, Mom Sues on 8-Year-Old's Behalf

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jazzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 0
  • Views Views 97

Jazzy

Waiting....
Valued Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
71,573
Reaction score
1,221
Points
2,125
Location
State Of Confusion
Website
wober.net
Police warned an 8-year-old girl before they tased her, and now her mother has filed a lawsuit, claiming police fired darts from the electroshock weapon into the girl's chest "within seconds," according to CNN.

The lawsuit says the force of the electricity shot through the girl's body, lifted her and threw her against a wall. "After the officers had stunned (the girl) into high voltage submission, they pulled the fish-hook-like Taser darts from her chest, gave her emergency medical attention, bandaged the holes left by the razor-sharp hooks, and called the ambulance," the lawsuit claims.

But why did police tase a young girl? To prevent her from hurting herself.

The girl's babysitter called police because the child had a knife in her hand. Everyone involved agreed on this matter: Dawn Stenstrom, the girl's mother and the defendants, the city of Pierre, South Dakota, it's former police chief, Robert Grandpre, and the four officers at the October 4, 2013 incident, CNN reported.

But, they don't share the same opinions about the officers' actions.

Strenstorm claims the police used "excessive force" when they tased her daughter, but Grandpre disagreed and felt that police "might possibly have saved this girl's life," he told CNN.

The South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation conducted an independent two-month investigation and ruled in December that the officer acted appropriately.

"Given the circumstances facing the officer at the time, it appears from the report that deploying a Taser was the best viable way to defuse the situation," said Wendy Kloeppner, the Hughes County state's attorney, in a statement.

But Dana Hanna, Strenstrom's attorney, doesn't think so. "That's bull****," Hanna told CNN Saturday.

"Four trained police officers surrounding a 70-pound, 8-year-old Indian girl" should have used less risky tactics, Hanna said.

"One distracts her, another grabs the girl's arm. That's what they should have done," Hanna said. "She had a kitchen paring knife, but hadn't cut. She was a kid throwing a tantrum. They should have made an attempt to grab the kid, not use a weapon to throw her into a wall," Hanna said.

Bobby Jones, the girl's father, told CNN affiliate KSFY, "I don't fault for the police being there because they were called. They were there. But what happened while they were there is why I'm upset."

One of the officers was a Taser instructor and another was a hostage negotiator.

The plaintiffs are seeking at least $100,000 in damages, plus punitive damages and "other relief as the court shall consider to be fair and equitable," CNN reported.

"Her pain and suffering is going to be of that type that a jury will have to tell us what it's worth," Hanna's co-counsel, Patrick Duffy, said. "Part of that is going to be a reflection of the fact that you're not supposed to use a Taser on a kid. I don't know of too many cops that don't know that."

Anderson, the defendants' attorney, said he didn't know if the case would go to trial, but Duffy said he hopes it does.

Source

Doo you think the case should go to trial? Why / Why not?
 

Create an account or login to post a reply

You must be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Create an account here on Off Topix. It's quick & easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Theme customizations unavailable!

    Theme customization fields are not available to you, please contact the administrator for more information.

  • Choose the color combination that reflects your taste
    Background images
    Color gradient backgrounds
Back