Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion
Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
Historic Statue Removal
- Thread starter Randy
- Start date
It's nothing new in our history. When people don't like something they resort to toppling statues and burning down buildings.
www.theguardian.com
The toppling of Saddam’s statue: how the US military made a myth
The long read: In 2003, the destruction of one particular statue in Baghdad made worldwide headlines and came to be a symbol of western victory in Iraq. But there was so much more to it – or rather, so much less
www.theguardian.com
I guess re-writing history means that it didn't happen; that way it can repeat over & over.
Is removing a statue rewriting history? If they were doing that they'd be scrubbing the history books and the internet of all traces of said history.
Yes, I think that in a way it is; I guess I feel the same way about re-naming sports teams. Soon nobody will remember that Sadam Hussein or Robt. E. Lee or the Cleveland Indians ever existed; and maybe that's all okay.Is removing a statue rewriting history? If they were doing that they'd be scrubbing the history books and the internet of all traces of said history.
...and like you said, we'll repeat the cycle again.Yes, I think that in a way it is; I guess I feel the same way about re-naming sports teams. Soon nobody will remember that Sadam Hussein or Robt. E. Lee or the Cleveland Indians ever existed; and maybe that's all okay.
In many instances the act of putting the statues themselves up is a rewriting of history. There is the whole thing about history being written by the victors and all that. I would not assume that leaving the statues up is any less political charged or objective than taking them down. It just depends on what we value as a society and which historical narratives we wish to promote and which we wish to neglect. Agreed that the removal of the statues in and of itself can not be the endpoint. It also requires a more critical engagement with history in our educational institutions. Something we are hopefully going to see here in New Zealand from next year, I believe.
@Scarlet Rose do you have a lot of historic statues around NZ?
@Nebulous yeah, my city has one right in the center dedicated to soldiers who died during WWI. I think we have various statues all throughout the country. Not all generate controversy. Some are more actively resisted. Although my city tends to have more abstract statues than historical ones. I am almost always daydreaming though haha.
I kind of like the abstract funky art that some cities are adopting. San Francisco is not too far from me and they always have cool things to look at.
We have lots of controversial ones here in the states since we used to be savages back in the day. Lol
They can be pretty neat. I am not very outgoing though, so I don't tend to notice them. Although on the rare times I am existing in the world I usually appreciate them.
We still do have our controversial statues too. As our historical narratives we have tended to learn here have been more favourable to our own colonialism. But that is changing as there is quite a massive revision to national standards for history education coming out. It is the result of something like 3 years work. Which was itself a process which began in response to a master student's thesis questioning how poor our own education was regarding our history.
Similar threads
