Hogwarts Legacy game launch becomes referendum on J.K. Rowling

[Randy]

Hogwarts Legacy video game launch becomes referendum on J.K. Rowling

Some outlets refuse to review the game, others include caveats.

www.axios.com

Hogwarts Legacy, the new video game stemming from author J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter" fiction, is launching this week to big sales and big controversy.

Why it matters: The game, which lets players create their own wizard and go through magic school, has become a flashpoint for reviewers and fans regarding what to do about work associated with Rowling.

• The Potter author has been accused of transphobia — she denies it — since 2018, when she “liked” a tweet that said that trans women are “men in dresses” (per Politico, she said it was for research purposes). Among her many comments on gender since then, she has mocked the idea that the phrase “people who menstruate” could refer to anything other than women.
• Amid calls for boycotts of Hogwarts Legacy, the game has still managed to top key PC and console bestseller lists weeks before its release, indicating high pre-order demand.

Driving the news: In a deviation from standard pre-release coverage, many outlets are putting caveats in their Hogwarts Legacy reviews, while others are sidestepping the game entirely. (Access to the game, so far, is controlled by Warner Bros., which like any other publisher, chooses which outlets to send review copies to.)

• IGN, the most popular video game media site in North America, ran a rave, but included a sidebar labeled “concerning J.K. Rowling” that states inconclusively: “As critics, our job is to answer the question of whether or not we find Hogwarts Legacy to be fun to play and why; whether it’s ethical to play is a separate but still very important question.”
• British gaming outlet RockPaperShotgun is counter-programming with a series of articles about magic-based games with a “special emphasis on magic games made by trans developers.”
• A Canadian outlet, TheGamer, is among those that won’t review Hogwarts Legacy. The publication also won’t create online guides for the game, a greater source of revenue, editor-in-chief Stacey Henley tells Axios. “This is not because of any issue with royalties or monetary support for J.K. Rowling, but because we feel the continued popularity of Harry Potter only provides her with a larger platform and further legitimizes her views, which we in turn feel are harmful to trans people.”

Between the lines: Rowling may profit from Hogwarts Legacy, but she didn’t write it. It was developed by Warner Bros.-owned Avalanche Software.

• The game’s official FAQ notes that J.K. Rowling is not involved in the creation of the game," but critics have said its popularity would still benefit Rowling.
• One actor for the game has said he is “really sorry to anyone hurt” by his inclusion in the game, joining actors for the Potter movies who have distanced themselves from Rowling and overtly supported trans rights.
• Meanwhile, some fans have sworn off buying the game due to what the Washington Post recently described as “the pain and difficulty in being a Harry Potter fan of late.”

What they're saying: The game’s actual creators have largely avoided explicitly addressing the Rowling issue, though there have been hints.

• News that the game will let players make trans characters by decoupling body and voice selections from gendered terms in the users’ character creation process has been viewed as a subtle repudiation of Rowling.
• Warner Bros.’ management has steered even more clear. Asked about possible boycotts in August, the company’s head of gaming, David Haddad, told Axios: “We're going to stay very focused on the game that we built and the great job that the Avalanche studio has done.” He added: “We want everybody that loves this world and loves these stories and loves these characters.”

In December, Rowling acknowledged calls for boycotts of Hogwarts Legacy after GameSpot writer Jessie Earl called support of the game “harmful.”

• Rowling quote-tweeted the claim, calling it “purethink” and snarked that people who disagree with her should burn down libraries.
• GameSpot has since published an essay by Earl about Rowling’s views and the game. It has not yet published a review of the game.

Thoughts?

 

[Nebulous]

JK Rowling is a douche!

 

[Webster]

Unfortunately people are starting to push back against criticism over Hogwarts: Legacy...

A Letter to Everyone, Left and Right, Over the Recent Events Surrounding 'Hogwarts Legacy'

The furor around 'Hogwarts Legacy' unveils an interesting fact.

redstate.com

 

[PGen98]

Just one simple thing to say about anything Potter or Rowling related now -- No.

 

[Webster]

Just one simple thing to say about anything Potter or Rowling related now -- No.

Had to walk away from a friendship I've had with someone over on a Discord server for several years now over this; my points in our last convo over the weekend were (1) I don't care for JK Rowling and what's she said in recent memory, (2) but I'm not going to work to cancel someone's livelihood or put 'em on an 'enemies list' 'cause they dared decided 'hey, I think I'll try it out, see if the game's as good as they say.'

Suffice it to say I got every cuss word and insult thrown at me; I was like "that's fine; you wanna' swear at me for having an opinion? Okay...but that kind of philosophy will backfire on you. You don't like the game 'cause of Rowling's politics? Fine; I don't care for hers' either but that does not give you the right to attack them if they decide they want to play it."

 

[PGen98]

Had to walk away from a friendship I've had with someone over on a Discord server for several years now over this; my points in our last convo over the weekend were (1) I don't care for JK Rowling and what's she said in recent memory, (2) but I'm not going to work to cancel someone's livelihood or put 'em on an 'enemies list' 'cause they dared decided 'hey, I think I'll try it out, see if the game's as good as they say.'

Suffice it to say I got every cuss word and insult thrown at me; I was like "that's fine; you wanna' swear at me for having an opinion? Okay...but that kind of philosophy will backfire on you. You don't like the game 'cause of Rowling's politics? Fine; I don't care for hers' either but that does not give you the right to attack them if they decide they want to play it."

I won't stop people from playing it and I won't be mad if they enjoy it, but I will never personally purchase another thing that will profit that woman. She is a blight, a cancer, and an utter disgrace. If Alex Jones were Scottish and had tits.

 

[Webster]

If Alex Jones were Scottish and had tits.

*considers mental image*

 

[MrDawn]

I read the first 4 Harry Potter books when I was 14. After that I lost interest. Even with all of the controversy I have no desire to play this game anyway. I'd rather play Final Fantasy, Outer Worlds, Fallout, Skyrim or the next Elder Scrolls game.