What's new

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Join Our Facebook Page Today!

Join the conversation and help spread the word about offtopix on Facebook! Your voice matters—let’s make an impact together!

Join Our X.com Page Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on X.com! Your voice is powerful, and together, we can create meaningful change!

Join offtopix Discord Server Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on Discord! Your voice holds incredible power, and together, we can create impactful change!

IBM researchers make 12-atom magnetic memory bit

Evil Eye

Watching
Valued Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Posts
48,465
Reaction score
71
Points
1,870
Location
¿Under the Ritual?
Website
malusluminis.webs.com
Researchers have successfully stored a single data bit in only 12 atoms.



Currently it takes about a million atoms to store a bit on a modern hard-disk, the researchers from IBM say.



They believe this is the world's smallest magnetic memory bit.



According to the researchers, the technique opens up the possibility of producing much denser forms of magnetic computer memory than today's hard disk drives and solid state memory chips.



Roughly every two years hard drives become denser, research lead author Sebastian Loth told the BBC.



The obvious question to ask is how long can we keep going. And the fundamental physical limit is the world of atoms.



The approach that we used is to jump to the very end, check if we can store information in one atom, and if not one atom, how many do we need? he said.



Below 12 atoms the researchers found that the bits randomly lost information, owing to quantum effects.



A bit can have a value of 0 or 1 and is the most basic form of information in computation.



We kept building larger structures until we emerged out of the quantum mechanical into the classical data storage regime and we reached this limit at 12 atoms.



The groups of atoms, which were kept at very low temperatures, were arranged using a scanning tunnelling microscope. Researchers were subsequently able to form a byte made of eight of the 12-atom bits.



Central to the research has been the use of materials with different magnetic properties.



The magnetic fields of bits made from conventional ferromagnetic materials can affect neighbouring bits if they are packed too closely together.



In conventional magnetic data storage the information is stored in ferromagnetic material, said Dr Loth, who is now based at the Center for Free-Electron Laser Science in Germany.



That adds up to a big magnetic field that can interfere with neighbours. That's a big problem for further miniaturisation.



Other scientists thought that was an interesting result.



Current magnetic memory architectures are fundamentally limited in how small they can go, Dr Will Branford, of Imperial College London, told the BBC.



This work shows that in principle data can be stored much more densely using antiferromagnetic bits.



But the move from the lab to the production may be some time away.



Even though I as a scientist would totally dig having a scanning tunnelling microscope in every household, I agree it's a very experimental tool, Dr Loth said.



Dr Loth believes that by increasing the number of atoms to between 150 to 200 the bits can be made stable at room temperature. That opens up the possibility of more practical applications.



This is now a technological challenge to find out about new manufacturing techniques, he said.



Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16543497





200 atoms would still be really small...
 
Smaller memory cards just means I'll lose them even more.
 
Skillet said:
Smaller memory cards just means I'll lose them even more.
But if you create something the size of a small book using this, you'll have more space than you can use... well... more space than you can remember anyway
tongue.png
 

Create an account or login to post a reply

You must be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Create an account here on Off Topix. It's quick & easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Theme customizations unavailable!

    Theme customization fields are not available to you, please contact the administrator for more information.

  • Choose the color combination that reflects your taste
    Background images
    Color gradient backgrounds
Back