What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Iraq Weighs Whether US Troops Should Stay After 8 Years

Jazzy

Wild Thing
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
79,918
OT Bucks
308,926
BAGHDAD -- The American invasion of Iraq was supposed to take only a few months: a quick blitz to depose dictator Saddam Hussein, find and dismantle weapons of mass destruction and go home.



Eight years later, thousands of U.S. troops remain in Iraq -- and their mission may not be accomplished until far into the future.



Despite a security agreement requiring a full U.S. military withdrawal by the year's end, hundreds if not thousands of American soldiers will continue to be in Iraq beyond 2012.



Just how many will stay is the heart of a tense and hushed debate among U.S. and Iraqi officials who want the fragile democracy to stand alone for the first time since the U.S.-led war began on March 20, 2003 -- but fear it could fall apart without military support.



Nobody wants foreign forces in his country, but sometimes the situation on the ground has the final say on such matters, said Sunni lawmaker Yassin al-Mutlaq in an interview this week. Right now, nobody can decide.



There are about 47,000 American troops in Iraq now, down from an October 2007 peak of 166,000. As of this week, 4,439 U.S. forces have been killed and the war has cost taxpayers more than $750 billion.



Full story: http://www.aolnews.com/2011/03/18/iraq-weighs-whether-us-troops-should-stay-after-8-years/
 
Back
Top Bottom