What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Jacqueline the Ripper? New book claims Britain's most notorious serial killer was actually a WOMAN

Jazzy

Wild Thing
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
79,918
OT Bucks
308,876
A sensational new book has caused a storm among historians by claiming that Jack the Ripper was, in fact, a woman.



Former solicitor John Morris, 62, has named Welsh-born Lizzie Williams as the Whitechapel monster - and claims she killed her victims because she could not have children, ripping out the wombs of three in an 'unhinged state'.



Lizzie was the wife of royal physician Sir John Williams, himself seen as a prime suspect by many other crime experts.



Mr Morris, from Birmingham, also cites evidence - which has not proved popular among Ripper experts - including the fact that none of the five murdered prostitutes was sexually assaulted; and the personal items of one, Annie Chapman, were laid out at her feet 'in a feminine manner'.



Mr Morris's new book, Jack The Ripper: The Hand Of A Woman, was written along with his late father Byron.



The men sifted through thousands of medical and legal documents to draw up a compelling case for branding Lizzie the killer.



But John, speaking from his current home in Wicklow, Ireland, said their theory has not gone down well with Ripperologists.



'The case for a woman murderer is overwhelming. But unfortunately it does not sit well in some quarters where such a theory flies in the face of long-held beliefs,' he told the Birmingham Mail.



'There’s absolutely no doubt that the Ripper was a woman. But because everyone believes that the murderer was a man, all the evidence that points to a woman has always been ignored.'



The Ripper struck five times during a blood-soaked ten weeks in 1888. The victims - Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes and Mary Jane Kelly - were all East End prostitutes.



Three had their wombs removed, which John believes is significant.



He says Welshwoman Lizzie, born on February 7, 1850, was unable to have children and, in an unhinged state, took terrible revenge on those who could.



Coroner Wynne Baxter said at Annie Chapman’s inquest: 'The conclusion that the desire was to possess the missing (body) part seems overwhelming.'



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rial-killer-actually-WOMAN.html#ixzz1uOASL4xn



Question: What are your thoughts on this theory?
 
I think this is an interesting theory enough for me to buy the book.
 
Well, I haven't read the book but the theory seems as plausible as most of the others... Although a female serial killer is statistically highly unlikely.
 
I can't wait to read this and report back after I've done so.



Anyone else going to read it?
 
If anyone reads this, can you give the theory the book gives, on why if she was Jack the Ripper, to why she stopped?
 
The Dragon Master said:
If anyone reads this, can you give the theory the book gives, on why if she was Jack the Ripper, to why she stopped?

This comes from the article posted:

Soon after the grisly deaths, Lizzie suffered a nervous breakdown. She died of cancer in 1912, having never been quizzed by police over the murders.​
 
The Dragon Master said:
Oh thank you Jazzy, I must have skimmed over it XD

You're very welcome. Pulling an EE now are you?
icon_e_wink.gif
 
At least you're honest Dragon!
hug.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom