What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

More charges for Megaupload in US case

Evil Eye

Watching
Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Posts
48,465
OT Bucks
70,099
US prosecutors have added wire fraud and additional criminal copyright infringement counts to their case against file-sharing site Megaupload.



New details have emerged as officials filed a 90-page superceding indictment against the company and its founder Kim Dotcom.



The site is accused of costing copyright holders more than $500m (£320m) in lost revenue.



The company says it was diligent in responding to pirated material.



In the indictment, the Department of Justice alleges that Megaupload organised the company's computer system's architecture around the rapid and repeated distribution of copyrighted works.



The company allegedly reproduced materials from other websites, including YouTube, and made them available on Megaupload.



User 'VV'



The new wire fraud charges are based on communications from the company to copyright holders.



In those emails, defendants falsely represented that infringing content had been removed when it had not been removed, Justice Department officials say.



The document also highlights one account holder that uploaded 16,950 files to sites the company owned, generating more than 34 million page views over the course of six years.



User VV was subject to numerous requests for removal, but records show no deletions of any of VV's uploaded files.



Megaupload paid user VV $3,400 through its rewards programme over the course of two years.



The indictment also contends that the site did not have have as many registered users as they claimed, and that of the 66 million registered accounts, only 5.4 million had ever uploaded a file to the service.



The Department of Justice has also added various properties, jet skis and jewellery to the list of assets subject to forfeiture.



Earlier this month, Mr Dotcom was denied bail in New Zealand.



He has denied the charges and has said he would fight an extradition application by the US.



Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17080942





At the very least they're getting a trial. Now to so what'll happen.
 
See, this isn't fair for MegaUpload. I mean MegaUpload was a service for uploading files to the Internet for a mass to download. General users can also upload perfectly fine meterial to the site and not just pirating. The objecting files should have been cleaned up from the database and let the site stay. I mean if the local gas station can sell bongs in the display case, then a file sharing site should stay open.
 
Back
Top Bottom