More of the not so peaceful protesters.

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

FTP Protestors Threaten Media – Back Up, Or I’ll Burn You….


FTP Activists / Protesters gathered Monday night in Los Angeles at 65th Street and Broadway, where Ezell Ford, a 25-year-old black man who family members said was mentally ill, was killed by two LAPD officers on Aug. 11. That vigil soon turned violent with some of the FTP demonstrators threatening members of the media covering the vigil.http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/12/30/ftp-protestors-threaten-media-back-up-or-ill-burn-you/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=e1Nt2L0rjKo

 

[seasidemike]

That wasn't violent.. I mean refer back to the media lies that they tell. Why because someone told some feck'n reporter to get out of her face? What makes the media think that they can get in anyone's face any time they want?

She asked them to back off, they did not. If in that case the reported was a police officer, can you imagine what they would be saying about the cop being in her face like that?

That is just more media bullshit, it didn't even look like a protest, it looked like a vigil

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

That wasn't violent.. I mean refer back to the media lies that they tell.  Why because someone told some feck'n reporter to get out of her face?  What makes the media think that they can get in anyone's face any time they want?

She asked them to back off, they did not.  If in that case the reported was a police officer, can you imagine what they would be saying about the cop being in her face like that?

That is just more media bullshit, it didn't even look like a protest, it looked like a vigil

The heck it was not violent. The woman took a lighter and attacked the reporter with it. They were shoving the camera people. When would it have been actually violent when the lighter actually began burning him?

 

[+paradox]

protesters?

seems to me it was just one person telling a person from the media to get out of her face, which she has the right to do and if you don't comply with her demands to get out of her face then she's legally able to try to get the person out of her face... she probably felt threaten over that stupid white guy all up in her face so she made him back up with a lighter...

again, more media bs and propaganda...

and of course nut-case hard righties eat this fake news up like candy...

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

Any reason or excuse to continue that anarchy and protect the violence they do.

 

[+paradox]

and i'm sure you're sniffing paint or something...

 

[Enter Username Here]

The police f*cked up on killing Ford. Finding muzzle marks in his back.

Obviously shot him off guard.

 

[seasidemike]

That wasn't violent.. I mean refer back to the media lies that they tell.  Why because someone told some feck'n reporter to get out of her face?  What makes the media think that they can get in anyone's face any time they want?

She asked them to back off, they did not.  If in that case the reported was a police officer, can you imagine what they would be saying about the cop being in her face like that?

That is just more media bullshit, it didn't even look like a protest, it looked like a vigil

The heck it was not violent. The woman took a lighter and attacked the reporter with it. They were shoving the camera people. When would it have been actually violent when the lighter actually began burning him?

oohhhhh a lighter ..... you mean she flicked her Bic at him??? wow... that could have burn a hair off his arm..

 

[Enter Username Here]

That wasn't violent.. I mean refer back to the media lies that they tell.  Why because someone told some feck'n reporter to get out of her face?  What makes the media think that they can get in anyone's face any time they want?

She asked them to back off, they did not.  If in that case the reported was a police officer, can you imagine what they would be saying about the cop being in her face like that?

That is just more media bullshit, it didn't even look like a protest, it looked like a vigil

The heck it was not violent. The woman took a lighter and attacked the reporter with it. They were shoving the camera people. When would it have been actually violent when the lighter actually began burning him?

oohhhhh a lighter   ..... you mean she flicked her Bic at him???  wow... that could have burn a hair off his arm..

I guess you've never been around an angry black girl with a lighter bruh.

 

[seasidemike]

One angry girl with a lighter does not make for a 'violent protest'

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

That wasn't violent.. I mean refer back to the media lies that they tell.  Why because someone told some feck'n reporter to get out of her face?  What makes the media think that they can get in anyone's face any time they want?

She asked them to back off, they did not.  If in that case the reported was a police officer, can you imagine what they would be saying about the cop being in her face like that?

That is just more media bullshit, it didn't even look like a protest, it looked like a vigil

The heck it was not violent. The woman took a lighter and attacked the reporter with it. They were shoving the camera people. When would it have been actually violent when the lighter actually began burning him?

oohhhhh a lighter   ..... you mean she flicked her Bic at him???  wow... that could have burn a hair off his arm..

Violence is violence against another person. So yes threatening to burn someone with a actual lighter is a big threat. While others shove the camera men around. As I said how much violence does it take to be a actual threat.

 

[+paradox]

One angry girl with a lighter does not make for a 'violent protest'

exactly...

fake news and propaganda at it's best right here...

and liberty is eating it right up...

 

[+paradox]

That wasn't violent.. I mean refer back to the media lies that they tell.  Why because someone told some feck'n reporter to get out of her face?  What makes the media think that they can get in anyone's face any time they want?

She asked them to back off, they did not.  If in that case the reported was a police officer, can you imagine what they would be saying about the cop being in her face like that?

That is just more media bullshit, it didn't even look like a protest, it looked like a vigil

The heck it was not violent. The woman took a lighter and attacked the reporter with it. They were shoving the camera people. When would it have been actually violent when the lighter actually began burning him?

oohhhhh a lighter   ..... you mean she flicked her Bic at him???  wow... that could have burn a hair off his arm..

Violence is violence against another person. So yes threatening to burn someone with a actual lighter is a big threat. While others shove the camera men around. As I said how much violence does it take to be a actual threat.

actually, the girl was in threat, that's why she told the dude to get out of her face, i guess you're blind and deaf... with a side of delusional...

liberty says someone rolling through and striking people that's in a crosswalk is not violent yet he says this girl is violent when this big guy doesn't respect this girls wishes by getting out of her face...

the reporter was trying to stir things up to get a story...

very shameful indeed...

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

One angry girl with a lighter does not make for a 'violent protest'

exactly...

fake news and propaganda at it's best right here...

and liberty is eating it right up look a joke...

Nothing fake in the least. They were attacked physically.

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

That wasn't violent.. I mean refer back to the media lies that they tell.  Why because someone told some feck'n reporter to get out of her face?  What makes the media think that they can get in anyone's face any time they want?

She asked them to back off, they did not.  If in that case the reported was a police officer, can you imagine what they would be saying about the cop being in her face like that?

That is just more media bullshit, it didn't even look like a protest, it looked like a vigil

The heck it was not violent. The woman took a lighter and attacked the reporter with it. They were shoving the camera people. When would it have been actually violent when the lighter actually began burning him?

oohhhhh a lighter   ..... you mean she flicked her Bic at him???  wow... that could have burn a hair off his arm..

Violence is violence against another person. So yes threatening to burn someone with a actual lighter is a big threat. While others shove the camera men around. As I said how much violence does it take to be a actual threat.

actually, the girl was in threat, that's why she told the dude to get out of her face, i guess you're blind and deaf... with a side of delusional...

liberty says someone rolling through and striking people that's in a crosswalk is not violent yet he says this girl is violent when this big guy doesn't respect this girls wishes by getting out of her face...

the reporter was trying to stir things up to get a story...

very shameful indeed...

Yes because news reporters with cameras are so well known for being violent. Just silly.

 

[Enter Username Here]

The protestors are protesting against violence, but they are showing violence.

Hmmmmmmmm

 

[DrLeftover]

The presence of the TV camera changes people's behavior.

 

[+paradox]

first the reporter says it's a peaceful protest, and in the same sentence he then says it's a vigil...

well? which is it? a peaceful protest or a vigil?

i think it was only a vigil but again the news loves to fake and make up things like usual...

 

[seasidemike]

This is a violent protest:

[521]

Not this:

[522]

 

[+paradox]

haha, very good @seasidemike, very good...