What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

New law pits guns vs. grizzlies in national parks

Jazzy

Wild Thing
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
79,918
OT Bucks
308,926
CHEYENNE, Wyo. – The grizzly took Jerry Ruth by surprise, bursting from thick brush and biting his jaw almost completely off.



On the ground and barely able to see, Ruth grabbed his .41 Magnum-caliber revolver and started shooting. The third bullet pierced the bear's heart and spinal cord, killing it from 25 feet.



I'm glad I was armed with a firearm and I'm glad I was able to shoot straight, said Ruth, attacked last July 19 a couple miles from his home not far from Yellowstone National Park.



Ruth's gun quite possibly saved his life. It also provided fodder for a long-standing debate about whether a gun or bear spray is better in fending off a grizzly attack.



And if that sounds like an esoteric discussion, it has intensified with a new federal law allowing people to carry guns in national parks.



Full Story: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100510...jA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yaWVzBHNsawNuZXdsYXdwaXRzZ3U-
 
Jazzy said:


Ruth's gun quite possibly saved his life. It also provided fodder for a long-standing debate about whether a gun or bear spray is better in fending off a grizzly attack.




Beer spray?



It's a good think he had his gun.
 
Back
Top Bottom