What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Playboy's

Randy

Aw, awww!
Thread Creator
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Posts
3,703
OT Bucks
13,121
Does anyone ever buy adult magazines anymore?
tongue.gif
yes.gif
 
My mom has Some playboy magazines so i think she or her friend used to.
 
Nebulous said:
Not everyone has the internet
wink.gif

If you have no access to the internet at all in 2010, why would you spend your money on pornography?
 
Payton said:
If you have no access to the internet at all in 2010, why would you spend your money on pornography?

Because they dont have the internet.
laugh.gif




Not everyone knows how to use a computer or has any desire to learn one.. Either that or they just dont want an extra bill to pay. Or perhaps they live in a rural area with no internet access even if they wanted it.
 
Nebulous said:
Because they dont have the internet.
laugh.gif




Not everyone knows how to use a computer or has any desire to learn one.. Either that or they just dont want an extra bill to pay. Or perhaps they live in a rural area with no internet access even if they wanted it.

Hm, true. But even so, the porn here on the internet is so much more abundant. I for one won't be buying any adult books (I can't even buy them yet) in the near future.
 
You read magazines about nuts?
run.gif


I hope you are talking about nuts you eat.. Like peanuts or cashews.
laugh.gif
 
no, it is called a mans magazine [corny i know] have not bought one in months.



Heres what it looks like [Click this spoiler at your own risk!]



Gemma-Merna-Nuts-Aug.jpg
 
Note for those who didn't understand the implications of the now-obscure reference to the Rat Pack of Frank, Dean, Peter, Sammy, and Nebulousy:



....They were men.



No, that's not quite right. They were Men. In every sense of the word, both good and bad. They did not apologize for it, they did not make concessions to those of lesser stature male or female because of it, they did not hide it, it was them. They were Men.



In today's terms, they might be labeled Uber-men or some other such meaningless word.



They were macho, but they did not practice Machismo.



They were masculine, but without using the affectations you see today.



What you saw was for the most part who they were. And whether or not you approved of it, accepted it, admired it or even cared, made not one whit of difference to them. Not at all.



If they arrived someplace in a rumpled suit with a day's growth of beard stubble, it wasn't a fashion statement (as it was on 'Miami Vice') it was because they has slept off last night's party in the back of a limmo with some woman they'd just met and the empty pack of cigarettes peeking from their pocket had been come by honestly and was not a prop....



...No salad munchers they either. Steaks were as much for breakfast as dinner.



Then there was sex. They were sexy, if anybody at the time could be, they were. They told suggestive jokes and naughty stories ...on stage with an audience with WOMEN in it no less... and everybody knew about them and the women.



And the women....



http://themediadesk.com/newfiles4/rats.htm
 
Back
Top Bottom