What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Remakes You Want!?

McConnaughay

An Instant Classic
Elite Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Posts
4,837
OT Bucks
12,820
Is there any remakes that you'd actually like to see?



Remakes have subsequently become the movie industry's bread and butter, and I think it's easy to see why, there's not a whole lot of originality required, but with only just a considerable amount of tweaking, you can create something entirely new. For some series', this has turned out to be for the best, things like The Dark Knight trilogy come to mind, in the sense that they weren't as much remakes as they were an entirely new imagination for what a movie could be. For superheroes, at least, I think it can be a good thing, as I am always looking to see them evolve into something different. There's also rarely noted things like Scarface were actually remakes that created something entirely different and innovative. However, there is other-times where it can be a little much. I remember the 1997 Psycho movie that they did with Vince Vaugn, as well as the remakes of things like A Nightmare on Elm Street, a kind-of, If it ain't broke, don't fix it, kind-of vibe is given off, at least to me.



However, with this being said, are there actually any remakes that you'd like to see, maybe because you think that there remains a considerable amount of potential with the series if modernly imaged, and done right? I think there is, and at least for me, I'd like to see a remake of Stephen King's It. The movie has always been something that I have a mixed bag for, because, in all honesty, the original wasn't necessarily tremendous, however, I always thought that it had potential. The movie basically came across like a clown variation of Freddy Krueger, with the ability to psychedelically and psychologically torment the victim, which is something always more interesting than the stereotypical slasher flick.



I think that I'd also like to see a remake of The Crow, which, I know, is a, Ain't broke moment, but I'd like to see it. I think that there remains stories to be told with The Crow idea, and to be honest, the three sequels that they had left a bad taste in my mouth. I'd like to see something reminiscent to The Crow, not necessarily going back to the Eric Draven stories, but a vengeance story with somebody dawning the white and black face-paint.​
 
Uhm... Maybe a film that sticks to the book
icon_neutral.gif
 
Evil Eye said:
Uhm... Maybe a film that sticks to the book
icon_neutral.gif

There's a lot of movies that stick to the book, behold Harry Potter, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Lord of the Rings, and Fight Club.
 
Or add things that weren't originally in the books. As if my memory serves me right. In the 6th Harry Potter movie, the Weasley home got put on fire. As where as in the 6th book it didn't happen.



Now I think I remember hearing about a new remake Crow film coming. But its been awhile. I know there's a new comic out currently. Personally, I think the folks in Hollywood need to get off their lazy asses *pardon my language* and get back to making original films. Instead of going to all the trouble to remake older films. I know especially not a whole lot of people want Michael Bay's new Ninja Turtles film.
 
Evil Eye said:
They cut parts out.

Actually, although, I can't speak for Lord of the Rings, (I kind-of misunderstood what you were saying before.) there's actually not a lot of difference whatsoever between the Harry Potter books and movies, that's what of the things about Harry Potter that's bazaar, everything from the books seemed in the movies, the only thing that I can really recall is that they took a lot of focus from Fred and George in the movies when they had it in the books, which isn't earth-shattering.
 
Nicholas McConnaughay said:
there's actually not a lot of difference whatsoever between the Harry Potter books and movies
That might be true and it definitely doesn't have to ruin a movie, but in some cases it's just really annoying.
 
Back
Top Bottom