Sex Ed.

[Nebulous's iconNebulous]

Should safe sex be promoted in schools through sexual education classes? Or are lessons that stick strictly to human biology or use abstinence-based better?

Why do you stand where you stand on this matter?

 

[McConnaughay]

Safe sex promotion will be more beneficial in the long run because your teachings aren't going to convince students of abstinence because they've probably already thought about this for years and have their minds made up for whichever direction they are going to go the most you can do is make their decisions protected.

 

[Evil Eye]

First year of middle school biology: the teacher actually handed out condoms.

 

[DrLeftover]

One way or the other, your children will be indoctrinated...



... and once California does it, the rest will ....

This FAIR Education Act Bill (SB 48) passed today by a wide margin, 23 to 14. Authored by Senator Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) the Bill will require public school to include gay history in their curriculum. By altering the school’s textbooks, the Bill aims at educating students about diverse people and lifestyles with the ultimate goal of lowering the likelihood of bullying. Senator LaMalfa (R- Richvale) is among those who oppose the bill, saying it is a bad idea to add this to the public system.

http://www.krcrtv.com/news/27551672/detail.html

 

[Evil Eye]

http://www.krcrtv.com/news/27551672/detail.html

What does that even mean?

There's no such thing, there's only human history collected from all sorts of biased sources.

History should be about comparing said sources and teaching the similarities, without political correctness ever rearing its ugly head. It doesn't matter what sexuality some long-dead person had, at least not in such a way that you should base a curriculum around it.

Wait... Freddy Mercury in history maybe?