Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
They should just follows taxation laws just like everyone elses. However I believe a number of them are non-profit therefore they don't have to pay any taxes since a profit isn't made at any periods.Do you think Churches should be required to pay taxes? Why or why not?
Agreed if they aren't of non profit nature they should be paying just like Amazon should be (in most cases, Amazon in 2019 actually didn't turn a cent in profit so they were able to legally and ethically spared being taxed).Depends on the church, I don't think they all go for non-profit actions.
Religious organizations across the United States have received at least $7.3 billion in forgivable government loans from the Paycheck Protection Program. The top loan recipients are, of course, of the majority religion. Megachurches with outspoken Trump-supporting pastors have received millions of dollars in loans, and churches tied to sexual abuse and financial scandals also took advantage of the free money.
This is a clear violation of the Lemon Test and of the Establishment Clause. The grants given to churches obviously do not have a clearly secular purpose, so it fails the first part of the test. The handouts advance the interests of the religious organizations that receive them, and I’m not sure how anyone could argue that the aid does not create unnecessary entanglement between church and state.
The tax church movement is more of an anti-religion / atheist thing than a legitimate source of getting income. Churches operate as a non-profit organizations just like the Salvation Army and Goodwill.