What's new

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Join Our Facebook Page Today!

Join the conversation and help spread the word about offtopix on Facebook! Your voice matters—let’s make an impact together!

Join Our X.com Page Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on X.com! Your voice is powerful, and together, we can create meaningful change!

Join offtopix Discord Server Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on Discord! Your voice holds incredible power, and together, we can create impactful change!

Tennessee law to permit criminal charges against pregnant moms who abuse drugs

Jazzy

Waiting....
Valued Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
71,573
Reaction score
1,221
Points
2,125
Location
State Of Confusion
Website
wober.net
A new law takes effect in Tennessee this summer that allows criminal charges to be brought against pregnant women who abuse drugs.

Tennessee will be the only place where a mother can be prosecuted based on the impact from drugs on her pregnancy. A mother can avoid going to jail if she enrolls in a drug treatment program.

The American Civil Liberties Union says the law is "dangerous" and could prevent women from getting necessary prenatal care.

Others, such as women's groups, health care providers and U.S. drug czars, have also spoken out against the law, CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman noted, adding, "The ACLU was not alone here."

However, on the other side of the equation, Klieman said the law functions as a "velvet hammer."

"This is a law that is saying, 'Look, we're giving up in Tennessee.' We have in Tennessee 921 cases last year of neonatal abstinence syndrome, meaning a child born of a pregnant mother who was drug addicted, the child is addicted. And what happens to this child is horrific.

"So they're saying, just as you'd introduced this, if you go into drug treatment, you're not going to jail. So the argument of saying, 'We're stopping women from from getting any kind of drug treatment because they're afraid of being arrested, that's a false argument. You've got a situation here where you need accountability. We have babies having babies. We have drug addicts having babies. What the governor has said after 10 days of in-depth study, is to say, 'I hear what everybody's telling me. I just don't know what else to do'."

The issue, according to Klieman, goes beyond a woman's right to choose. "This isn't just about the pregnancy," she said. "If you're a drug addict, you're giving birth to a drug-addicted child."

Source

What are your thoughts about this law? Is it good or bad and why?
 
Once a women is pregnant she is responsible for another life. If its just her and she is not hurting others or costing me money in medical bills then do what you want. But that all changes when she is carrying a new life that I believe has the same exact rights as the born.
 
A new law takes effect in Tennessee this summer that allows criminal charges to be brought against pregnant women who abuse drugs.

How are they going to enforce this law? Are they going to do blood and urine tests on every pregnant woman in the state of Tennessee?
 
Jazzy said:
A new law takes effect in Tennessee this summer that allows criminal charges to be brought against pregnant women who abuse drugs.

How are they going to enforce this law? Are they going to do blood and urine tests on every pregnant woman in the state of Tennessee?

I imagine if a women comes in with a medical condition. Or after the women has a baby it they can determine if the baby is addicted to drugs.
 
From the article
The law will be in effect for two years, and during that time, Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam says he will study the law.

Klieman said, "He's going to see if ultimately families are being separated and this is a draconian law."

Wouldn't it make more sense to study the law BEFORE enacting it? I can see the lawsuits coming already.
 
Jazzy said:
From the article
The law will be in effect for two years, and during that time, Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam says he will study the law.

Klieman said, "He's going to see if ultimately families are being separated and this is a draconian law."

Wouldn't it make more sense to study the law BEFORE enacting it? I can see the lawsuits coming already.

What do you mean by study? And what lawsuits do you think would happen?
 
Here's what he should have studied before signing this into law:

Although drug possession and drug sales can result in criminal charges, states typically do not arrest people simply for using drugs. Addiction is considered to be a medical issue, and under the Constitution’s definition of cruel and unusual punishment, states aren’t allowed to criminalize those types of disorders. But Tennessee is making an exception for pregnant people. (Source)

So , now do you see what the lawsuits will be based on?
 
And here comes the story to support what I said before:

Over-35 pregnant smokers risk baby heart defects
2 May 2014

Babies born to women over 35 who smoke are at greater risk of having specific heart defects, suggests American research.

The study, from Seattle Children's Hospital, adds to existing evidence that smoking during pregnancy can damage babies' hearts, as well as increase the risk of miscarriage, small babies and premature birth.

Around 13% of women smoke during pregnancy in England.

The government has set a target of 11%.

Smoking during early pregnancy could account for 1%-2% of all heart defects in babies, the study said.
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-27252941
 
DrLeftover said:
And here comes the story to support what I said before:

Over-35 pregnant smokers risk baby heart defects
2 May 2014

Babies born to women over 35 who smoke are at greater risk of having specific heart defects, suggests American research.

The study, from Seattle Children's Hospital, adds to existing evidence that smoking during pregnancy can damage babies' hearts, as well as increase the risk of miscarriage, small babies and premature birth.

Around 13% of women smoke during pregnancy in England.

The government has set a target of 11%.

Smoking during early pregnancy could account for 1%-2% of all heart defects in babies, the study said.
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-27252941

But, where's the law that will allow criminal charges to be brought against pregnant women who smoke?
 
Tennessee will be the only place where a mother can be prosecuted based on the impact from drugs on her pregnancy.

Pray tell how are they going to know the impact from drugs on her pregnancy until AFTER the baby is born? What if there was no impact at all but they find out she's used drugs? Does she still go to jail?

A mother can avoid going to jail if she enrolls in a drug treatment program.
Okay. Now let's say there was an impact from her using drugs and she doesn't enroll in this drug treatment program. Off to jail she goes. The baby now has no mother, becomes a ward of the state and guess who ultimately pays for all of this? Can we all say the word taxpayers, sure we can......

If this state has to go this far to a profile pregnant women, they have a serious drug problem and should going after the dealers/suppliers instead.
 
Jazzy said:
Tennessee will be the only place where a mother can be prosecuted based on the impact from drugs on her pregnancy.

Pray tell how are they going to know the impact from drugs on her pregnancy until AFTER the baby is born? What if there was no impact at all but they find out she's used drugs? Does she still go to jail?

A mother can avoid going to jail if she enrolls in a drug treatment program.
Okay. Now let's say there was an impact from her using drugs and she doesn't enroll in this drug treatment program. Off to jail she goes. The baby now has no mother, becomes a ward of the state and guess who ultimately pays for all of this? Can we all say the word taxpayers, sure we can......

If this state has to go this far to a profile pregnant women, they have a serious drug problem and should going after the dealers/suppliers instead.

So how do you suggest we get justice for a baby that was abused while under the care of a mother during pregnancy. And make no mistake this is child abuse.
 
Yes, it is.

But, then, what do you do with those ignorant women who claim they 'didn't know they were pregnant'?

Most of whom are: 1. obese. 2. Almost, if not functionally, illiterate. 3. Economically 'disadvantaged'. and 4. often 'hooked up with' an 'ethnic minority'.
 
Smooth said:
Well hell, let's forbid pregnant women from driving, too. They could get into an accident and injure or kill themselves and/or the fetus.
Better watch what they eat, too. And we can't have them hanging around people who smoke or do drugs, just in case the mother gets affected by second hand smoke.
We should probably just lock all pregnant women into a bubble, monitoring them 24 hours a day, just to be certain they're not doing anything to harm the fetus. Yes, we'll build a camp of sorts, to house any woman for the entirety of her pregnancy. That'll keep the babies safe. To hell with the mother's rights, as long as the fetus is safe.

Can you guess what I think of this law? {insert eye roll here}

There is a difference between going about your normal life and a accident happens while driving. Or driving recklessly and running red lights and speeding. Or say having crack cocaine and a Cheeseburger. And there is a difference having a glass of wine while someone else has a entire bottle of wine and drives drunk. You would be charged for child abuse if your child was born and with you for any of these.
 
DrLeftover said:
Yes, it is.

But, then, what do you do with those ignorant women who claim they 'didn't know they were pregnant'?

Most of whom are: 1. obese. 2. Almost, if not functionally, illiterate. 3. Economically 'disadvantaged'. and 4. often 'hooked up with' an 'ethnic minority'.

I would say none of those is a excuse or should be excused.
 

Create an account or login to post a reply

You must be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Create an account here on Off Topix. It's quick & easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Theme customizations unavailable!

    Theme customization fields are not available to you, please contact the administrator for more information.

  • Choose the color combination that reflects your taste
    Background images
    Color gradient backgrounds
Back