There are at least TWO terrorists on Off Topix

[DrLeftover]

Me and T are evidently both potential terrorists.



By declaration of the Department of Safety and Homeland Security.



You may decide which is which

Detailed information on each category of ideological motivation can be found in the Profiles of Perpetrators of Terrorism-United States report compiled by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (Miller, Smarick, and Simone, 2011). Briefly, the report describes each category as follows:

Extreme Right-Wing: groups that believe that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent (for some the threat is from a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group), and believe in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism. Groups may also be fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation), anti-global, suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty, and believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.





Extreme Left-Wing: groups that want to bring about change through violent revolution rather than through established political processes. This category also includes secular left-wing groups that rely heavily on terrorism to overthrow the capitalist system and either establish “a dictatorship of the proletariat” (Marxist-Leninists) or, much more rarely, a decentralized, non-hierarchical political system (anarchists).

http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf

 

[Temerit]

I'm not extreme left wing.



And yeah some crazy right-wing bozo on another site I go to already posted this.

 

[DrLeftover]

You're not?



OK, Who are you and what have you done with my friend T?



Somebody check under his bed for pods from outer space.

 

[Evil Eye]

Extreme Left-Wing: groups that want to bring about change through violent revolution rather than through established political processes.

Hey, Doc, didn't you want to kick the bums out?

 

[DrLeftover]

Via the voting booth, yes.



I don't think either me nor T are in favor of the national razor.

 

[Evil Eye]

Not even if you could do it by just firing them? A White Revolution if you will.



So, what's it like being a terrorist?

 

[DrLeftover]

Not even if you could do it by just firing them? A White Revolution if you will.



So, what's it like being a terrorist?

Voting them out would be 'firing them'.



I'd like you to explain that next term.



I don't feel any different, but I'll get back to you on that.

 

[Evil Eye]

Voting them out would be 'firing them'.

But judging from the fact that you keep posting that same thing with a different year, I'd say it isn't working very well. If you had a use-once power to remove every politician from office, would you use it?



As for the term, a bloodless revolution. I just named it after this, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Revolution.

 

[DrLeftover]

Evil... thank you, I had forgotten about that.



But we are already part of the way there to the results of the Shaw's, reforms.

also had one of the lowest percentages of people who were receiving a higher education. For example, 68 percent of the adult population still remained illiterate, and 60 percent of children did not complete primary school.