Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion
Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
Who owns the west?
- Thread starter +paradox
- Start date
Something we can agree on. Yes it is madness and was never the intention from the founders for the federal government to take control of so much land. The states are supposed to be sovereign and under there own control. The only land the federal government should have needed is for the military.
I guess that it must be all historical, where the East was developed quickly with high immigration the western expansion was highly subsidized by the Federal Government which was very much involved in the military push into the West. I makes sense that they would of held onto important lands.
It is not like the States just woke up one day and were all there.
It is not like the States just woke up one day and were all there.
and if you think about it, the East was founded and owned by King George of England until it was taken from him by the Revolution so it never would have been owned by the Federal government anyway because there wasn't one.
Not to worry.
Uncle can manage his lands just fine. Just like they run Section 8 Housing.
No, bad example. The TSA?
Food stamps?
CDC?
They do just fine with the postal service... well, on good days.
Uncle can manage his lands just fine. Just like they run Section 8 Housing.
No, bad example. The TSA?
Food stamps?
CDC?
They do just fine with the postal service... well, on good days.
Similar threads
