What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Why do men exist?

Jazzy

Wild Thing
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
79,918
OT Bucks
308,876
Since in many species, sperm is males' only contribution to reproduction, biologists have long puzzled about why evolutionary selection, known for its ruthless efficiency, allows them to exist.

Now British scientists have an explanation: Males are required for a process known as "sexual selection" which helps species to ward off disease and avoid extinction.

A system where all offspring are produced without sex -- as in all-female asexual populations -- would be far more efficient at reproducing greater numbers of offspring, the scientists said.

But in research published in the journal Nature on Monday, they found that sexual selection, in which males compete to be chose by females for reproduction, improves the gene pool and boosts population health, helping explain why males are important.

An absence of selection -- when there is no sex, or no need to compete for it -- leaves populations weaker genetically, making them more vulnerable to dying out.

"Competition among males for reproduction provides a really important benefit, because it improves the genetic health of populations," said professor Matt Gage, who led the work at Britain's University of East Anglia.

"Sexual selection achieves this by acting as a filter to remove harmful genetic mutations, helping populations to flourish and avoid extinction in the long-term."

Almost all multi-cellular species reproduce using sex, but its existence is not easy to explain biologically, Gage said, because sex has big downsides -- including that only half of the offspring, the daughters, will produce offspring themselves.

"Why should any species waste all that effort on sons?" he said.

In their study, Gage's team evolved Tribolium flour beetles over 10 years under controlled laboratory conditions, where the only difference between populations was the intensity of sexual selection during each adult reproductive stage.

The strength of sexual selection ranged from intense competition -- where 90 males competed for only 10 females -- through to the complete absence of sexual selection, with monogamous pairings in which females had no choice and males no competition.

After seven years of reproduction, representing about 50 generations, the scientists found that populations where there had been strong sexual selection were fitter and more resilient to extinction in the face of inbreeding.

But populations with weak or non-existent sexual selection showed more rapid declines in health under inbreeding, and all went extinct by the tenth generation.

Men exist to lift heavy things and kill bugs, I thought we all knew this already. :lol:

Your thoughts?
 
That's what my mom's for! lol To kill bugs.
 
what is interesting is that in the last 100 years just with the two world wars and not even taking into account all the other wars, and normally in war soldiers need to be healthy and fit and have a standard of physical fitness etc
Considering that over 70 million men were killed between both wars, and many more in revolution etc would we be damaging our gene pool by leaving the reproduction to the unfit guys who did not make it into the army?

Think about it, if millions and millions of strong healthy men get killed in war? It is all the left over guys that get to repopulate the world. yikes
 
I thought I existed because my parents wanted children.
Considering that over 70 million men were killed between both wars, and many more in revolution etc would we be damaging our gene pool by leaving the reproduction to the unfit guys who did not make it into the army?
Possibly, but probably not. For one thing biological fitness != physical fitness necessarily. More importantly though, how many of those soldiers do you think got laid when they got home? Perhaps with several women. That's a lot of compensating right there.
 
I thought I existed because my parents wanted children.
Possibly, but probably not. For one thing biological fitness != physical fitness necessarily. More importantly though, how many of those soldiers do you think got laid when they got home? Perhaps with several women. That's a lot of compensating right there.
Good point ... The post war boom ,
Forgot about that
 
Don't forget excessive drinking. If it weren't for men, who would drink all the alcohol and abuse women & children while drunk? :(
 
Back
Top Bottom