Sons with No Fathers = Crime etc?

[The Jason]

This opinion is actually true, even if it's from a biased right-wing network.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/gen...31&cvid=7d035ac34f9f487aa2236e63cc5cdde8&ei=9

This isn’t conjecture. It’s fact. According to the American Experiment, a child without a father is five times more likely to commit crime and be poor, nine times more likely to drop out of school and 20 times more likely to end up in jail.

In neighborhoods across D.C., gangs have replaced families. Drug dealers have replaced fathers. Violence has replaced manhood. And yet, we act surprised when carjackings, shootings and murders spiral out of control? Spare me.

This didn’t happen by accident. It’s the predictable outcome of a culture that stopped valuing family and started excusing failure.

And if that offends anyone on the Left, good. Because this isn’t about making them feel good.

 

[KO896]

Culture plays a big part in all of that. I have some former students who were into having babies for their baby daddys because it was like some status thing. Marriage wasn't even up for discussion by the men even though the women secretly wanted them to propose. Until the men moved onto to the next baby mama. It's realy sad.

 

[The Jason]

Culture plays a big part in all of that. I have some former students who were into having babies for their baby daddys because it was like some status thing. Marriage wasn't even up for discussion by the men even though the women secretly wanted them to propose. Until the men moved onto to the next baby mama. It's realy sad.

More money is made from the government than from a poor man in many cases.

 

[Grungie]

Culture plays a big part in all of that. I have some former students who were into having babies for their baby daddys because it was like some status thing. Marriage wasn't even up for discussion by the men even though the women secretly wanted them to propose. Until the men moved onto to the next baby mama. It's realy sad.

Oof, that’s really sad.

That reminds me of high school, there were a group of kids that lived in I think a group home? I don’t remember what it was called, but basically their parents lost custody of them and they had no family to move in with so that organization took them in.

Anyway…

I remember the girls in that group were all having a competition with who could get pregnant first, and it’s like… why?

 

[The Jason]

Democrats etc. can gripe about this all they want, but no doubt if men can't be men this happens, and government help enables it.

But what you will hear from the left is how "Oh the poor children are getting food aid cut etc.").

No, there's plenty of food for children if real men and women will get to work! Anyone want to argue?