The European Parliament will effectively kill off the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), the treatyââ¬â¢s rapporteur tells The Telegraph.
Members of the Polish parliament wore 'Anonymous' masks to protest against the ACTA bill
David Martin MEP said that the controversial treaty was likely to be rejected by the Parliament in July, and that new measures to deter music, film and software piracy were likely to take two years before they came into force.
Mr Martin stepped in to become the Treatyââ¬â¢s rapporteur in the European parliament after the resignation of Kader Arif, who condemned the process of secret talks.
Mr Martin said that the treaty would not effectively tackle online piracy and that he would be recommending Parliament reject it. He added, however, that the debate, which involved riots in some capitals, had become ââ¬Åunnecessarily hystericalââ¬Â. He claimed the treaty ââ¬Ånever seriously proposedââ¬Â a divisive ââ¬Åthree-strikes and youââ¬â¢re outââ¬Â policy of disconnecting pirates from the web and that it would never, as was reported, have meant searching peopleââ¬â¢s iPod at border controls.
ââ¬ÅThe case for stronger inteleectual property defence is very clear,ââ¬Â said Mr Martin. ââ¬ÅBut the atmosphere was wrong, with negotiations done behind closed doors without any real information coming out afterwards. Whatââ¬â¢s emerged is a thin text with insufficient detail, which appears to put duties on internet service providers to act as internet policemen.ââ¬Â It made no attempt to define, he said, for instance between ââ¬Åcommercialââ¬Â and ââ¬Åpersonalââ¬Â downloading.
Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/9203093/ACTA-treaty-dead-in-the-water.html
Question: Do you agree that the ACTA treaty should be rejected? Why or why not.

Members of the Polish parliament wore 'Anonymous' masks to protest against the ACTA bill
David Martin MEP said that the controversial treaty was likely to be rejected by the Parliament in July, and that new measures to deter music, film and software piracy were likely to take two years before they came into force.
Mr Martin stepped in to become the Treatyââ¬â¢s rapporteur in the European parliament after the resignation of Kader Arif, who condemned the process of secret talks.
Mr Martin said that the treaty would not effectively tackle online piracy and that he would be recommending Parliament reject it. He added, however, that the debate, which involved riots in some capitals, had become ââ¬Åunnecessarily hystericalââ¬Â. He claimed the treaty ââ¬Ånever seriously proposedââ¬Â a divisive ââ¬Åthree-strikes and youââ¬â¢re outââ¬Â policy of disconnecting pirates from the web and that it would never, as was reported, have meant searching peopleââ¬â¢s iPod at border controls.
ââ¬ÅThe case for stronger inteleectual property defence is very clear,ââ¬Â said Mr Martin. ââ¬ÅBut the atmosphere was wrong, with negotiations done behind closed doors without any real information coming out afterwards. Whatââ¬â¢s emerged is a thin text with insufficient detail, which appears to put duties on internet service providers to act as internet policemen.ââ¬Â It made no attempt to define, he said, for instance between ââ¬Åcommercialââ¬Â and ââ¬Åpersonalââ¬Â downloading.
Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/9203093/ACTA-treaty-dead-in-the-water.html
Question: Do you agree that the ACTA treaty should be rejected? Why or why not.