What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

ANOTHER reason NOT to use Wikipedia

DrLeftover

Forum Curmudgeon (certified)
Elite Member
Joined
May 13, 2010
Posts
17,443
OT Bucks
47,765
... because they CAN do this:


02/02/2014

Feminist groups at more than a dozen universities are planning to participate in another mass “edit Wikipedia day,” because the free, volunteer encyclopedia website is obviously horribly sexist.

Sarah Stierch, a Wikipedia contributor and researcher for the Wikimedia Foundation, said the problem isn’t just that most Wikipedia user are male. The layout of the website is itself “very masculine,” she said.

“It’s aesthetically very masculine in its design,” said Stierch in a statement to The Daily Dot, also noting that, “The average Wikipedia editor is a well-educated white male. Well-educated white males have been writing history and the story of the world since ancient times.”

To fix this, feminists at colleges around the country are launching another ‘Wikipedia Edit-A-Thon.’ Next week, feminists are encouraged to change rewrite the online encyclopedia to make it less masculine, according to Campus Reform.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/02/wikipedia-is-very-masculine-so-feminists-pledge-to-fix-it/#ixzz2sHzGFQ1O
 
Actually, what they're doing isn't all that bad. They're just going to flesh out articles and add new ones about female artists. It's not vandalism they're after.

'sides, Wikipedia's moderators are reasonably strict.
 
When the online encyclopedia started, I was a registered editor with the service, and some of the pages I worked on are still there.

Then cliques developed inside the ranks of their editors, and preferences began to be shown to those who made financial contributions to the operation, including allowing those who did so to break some of the rules without penalty.

That's when I resigned and stopped using them as a reference in articles.
 
Back
Top Bottom