Disclosure

[DrLeftover]

The White House recently said that there is no evidence of UFOs.

White House: There's no sign of E.T. or UFO cover-up

Science policy official responds to petitions calling for full disclosure

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45176460/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.TtkNUFbXOBo





Do you believe them?

 

[Jazzy]

Do they ever tell us the truth?

 

[DrLeftover]

Not to my knowledge.



I think it is against the sworn religion of every politician that ever crawled out of whatever festering cesspool of rotting filth they are hatched in.....



that religion being- Power, Money, and Control.





But there are still true believers in O that swallow everything he says. I was wondering about them.

 

[Evil Eye]

Do you believe them?

On this? Sure... Why not.

It's a 50/50 deal anyway.

 

[DrLeftover]

50 -50?



No.



Not by a long shot.



If you believe in nearly any religion including Wicca/Christianity/Judaism/Islam not to mention being a Hindu/Sikh/Bahai/Shinto/Taoist, etc.... You believe that an intelligent being from outside OUR WORLD intervened in the otherwise normal progression of human history on more than one occasion and changed things as they saw fit.



I guess your definition of ET depends on where you are standing when you use the term.



If you are referring to the Annunaki/Nephilum and so on... then, well, it amounts to basically the same thing we just discussed.



Doesn't it?

 

[Evil Eye]

50/50 in the sense that, if they do know they won't tell and if they don't know they'll say the same. Either they know or they don't, the answer won't change.

Doesn't it?

It does, but I wouldn't want to go and use religious texts for evidence. Or for that matter anything carved on some ancient wall.

Evidence for UFOs would have to be either credible footage or a (semi-)intact UFO.

 

[DrLeftover]

The ultimate proof would be the mothership hovering over Times Square beaming Yo, Homie, we're back to every audio/visual receiver in the hemisphere during the New Year's ball drop.



Or the equivalent.



Anything less leaves it, and them, in the realm of speculation and faith.

 

[Evil Eye]

That would be so perfect, everyone would see it as an elaborate hoax.

 

[Cranos]

I do believe them on this point. Not because I'm so naive that I think they always tell the truth, but because I don't believe in UFO's to begin with.

 

[Phazite]

Do you believe them?

This question carries the assumption that they would even know in the first place. All we can do is evaluate the evidence. I myself haven't found any truly convincing evidence.

 

[Skillet]

I do believe them on this point. Not because I'm so naive that I think they always tell the truth, but because I don't believe in UFO's to begin with.

My thoughts exactly.

This question carries the assumption that they would even know in the first place. All we can do is evaluate the evidence. I myself haven't found any truly convincing evidence.

Agreed. Until I see something that convinces me otherwise, I believe them on this one.

 

[DrLeftover]

Things like this are far from religious texts even though it is couched in religiously toned language-



New Haven UFO, 1647



http://www.celebrateboston.com/ufo/new-haven-ufo-1647.htm

 

[DrLeftover]

You don't have to rely on NASA.



The lights over Phoenix being a good example.



Even though there have been claims of deliberate hoaxing, no explanation or re-creation has ever been satisfactory.

 

[Temerit]

Why would they keep it a secret?

 

[Temerit]

[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Or they think it would freak every one out?

Why? If extra-terrestrials have been visiting for so long without harming anyone, what is there to be afraid of? Obviously they have no intention of harming us.