What's new

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Join Our Facebook Page Today!

Join the conversation and help spread the word about offtopix on Facebook! Your voice matters—let’s make an impact together!

Join Our X.com Page Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on X.com! Your voice is powerful, and together, we can create meaningful change!

Join offtopix Discord Server Today!

Join the conversation and become a champion for Offtopix on Discord! Your voice holds incredible power, and together, we can create impactful change!

Ferguson police say teen shot by cop was suspect in robbery

TRUE LIBERTY said:
Princess Alexandros XVII said:
According to "a source" (make of this what you will), Brown assaulted the police officer, among other things fracturing his eye socket.

Wilson was reportedly badly beaten and left with serious facial injuries following the fatal shooting in the St Louis suburb, including an eye socket fracture. The officer was almost knocked unconscious by Brown's blows, according to the source.

The leaked information on Wilson's injuries added yet another dimension to the fatal shooting on August 9 as Attorney-General Eric Holder arrived in Ferguson today to oversee a federal investigation into the cop killing which has ignited Ferguson into violent, racially-charged protests.

The police source told Fox today: 'The Assistant (Police) Chief took him to the hospital, his face all swollen on one side. He was beaten very severely.'

The source continued: 'They ignored him [Wilson] and the officer started to get out of the car to tell them to move. They shoved him right back in, that’s when Michael Brown leans in and starts beating Officer Wilson in the head and the face.'

ABC News also reported on Wednesday that a police source revealed Officer Wilson suffered a 'serious facial injury'.

The Gateway Pundit reported on Tuesday that the officer had suffered an 'orbital blowout fracture'.

A police source has confirmed to MailOnline that Wilson was taken to hospital and treated for facial injuries sustained during the Brown incident but would not elaborate on the severity or nature of those injuries.

Last week, Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson said Wilson had suffered swelling to the side of his face but gave few details of the injuries.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2730229/Ferguson-cop-shot-dead-Michael-Brown-severely-beaten-teenager.html

There's so many stories now I have no clue what to believe.

Photos will come out just like they did for the trayvon shooting. Its no wonder it took six shots to take him down. He probably could see straight after getting that kind of damage to your face.

that does make sense. the hits were from the arm up and into the chest and face. that would be consistent with a cop shooting with a blasted eye trying to take down such a big guy charging at him.

don't forgot that wilson needs to have probable cause to make the stop and pissing brown off enough to attack him. this is going to get very ugly before it's over. sure mike brown is a big thug and maybe he did steal those cigars. he definitely roughed up the store clerk, but wilson stopped him for jaywalking.
 
Excuse me!

Wilson got shot for (a) physically attacking an officer (b) not obeying an officer's command, and (c) charging at an officer. This officer had already suffered injuries from Wilson, do you really think he was going to let him charge at him and just stand there and do nothing?
 
TRUE LIBERTY said:
TommyTooter said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
TommyTooter said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
+Justice said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
As far as I am concerned if you loot or riot you should be shot on sight. But this is good news for the cop.

Jesus Christ, what?

Are you serious?

That's not how a civilized country should be, this is America with courts, judges and juries to decide if a person's crime is worth dying over not you and not for looting and rioting, unless one is defending themselves...

Don't get the few bad apples that are looting confused on about what this is all about, those people are protesting because cops and getting away with murder...



Very serious!. If you destroy somebody's means of supporting themselves and there family it needs to be stopped right there. What a sweet life living off the governments money stolen from me and others to loot and riot the people who are paying them all there freebies. So they can do nothing all day but bitch, destroy and moan just how bad they have it in life. A modern society does not need these kinds of low lives ruining businesses and lives.

And it is not just a few bad apples. And if it was just a few bad apples which it is no such thing the rest should be supporting the cops and protesting to stop making there cause from going down the drain.
:s
'murica! land of the fee and home of the slave

who said the nazis lost world war ii? they just flipped the capitols from rome and berlin to tel aviv and washington, DC ( see: operation paper clip)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dKOVSUTq68


0000lincoln2.jpg


I have no idea what this has to do with people destroying other peoples property and there means of making a living. So are you saying they should have free reign to do as they please on others until there version of justice is done?

And I find it humorous you posted videos but yet you yourself will not watch them. But the one above Lincoln is not working by the way.
i'm saying that your belief system is fascist and you're a fool unworthy of engaging at all.


So wanting to stop looter and rioters by any means necessary to protect peoples lives and personal businesses who depend these things to feed there families is facist? I had no idea the meaning of facist changed.

it's called business insurance...
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/open/finance/OPEN-INSURANCE-FAQ.html

if you wake up and catch someone breaking into your car, do you have the right to shoot and kill that person? No, because you're not on the defense, you're not protecting yourself, you're on the offense and want to be the judge and jury...

same thing with you're thoughts of killing people just because they are looting...
 
+Justice said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
TommyTooter said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
TommyTooter said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
+Justice said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
As far as I am concerned if you loot or riot you should be shot on sight. But this is good news for the cop.

Jesus Christ, what?

Are you serious?

That's not how a civilized country should be, this is America with courts, judges and juries to decide if a person's crime is worth dying over not you and not for looting and rioting, unless one is defending themselves...

Don't get the few bad apples that are looting confused on about what this is all about, those people are protesting because cops and getting away with murder...



Very serious!. If you destroy somebody's means of supporting themselves and there family it needs to be stopped right there. What a sweet life living off the governments money stolen from me and others to loot and riot the people who are paying them all there freebies. So they can do nothing all day but bitch, destroy and moan just how bad they have it in life. A modern society does not need these kinds of low lives ruining businesses and lives.

And it is not just a few bad apples. And if it was just a few bad apples which it is no such thing the rest should be supporting the cops and protesting to stop making there cause from going down the drain.
:s
'murica! land of the fee and home of the slave

who said the nazis lost world war ii? they just flipped the capitols from rome and berlin to tel aviv and washington, DC ( see: operation paper clip)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dKOVSUTq68


0000lincoln2.jpg


I have no idea what this has to do with people destroying other peoples property and there means of making a living. So are you saying they should have free reign to do as they please on others until there version of justice is done?

And I find it humorous you posted videos but yet you yourself will not watch them. But the one above Lincoln is not working by the way.
i'm saying that your belief system is fascist and you're a fool unworthy of engaging at all.


So wanting to stop looter and rioters by any means necessary to protect peoples lives and personal businesses who depend these things to feed there families is facist? I had no idea the meaning of facist changed.

it's called business insurance...
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/open/finance/OPEN-INSURANCE-FAQ.html

if you wake up and catch someone breaking into your car, do you have the right to shoot and kill that person? No, because you're not on the defense, you're not protecting yourself, you're on the offense and want to be the judge and jury...

same thing with you're thoughts of killing people just because they are looting...

You do not live in Florida do you? Yes you do. And I am protecting myself. My vehicle is the center of my business. No tools and I cant feed my family and that threatens my families life and mine.

776.031 Use or threatened use of force in defense of property.—
(1) A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on, or other tortious or criminal interference with, either real property other than a dwelling or personal property, lawfully in his or her possession or in the possession of another who is a member of his or her immediate family or household or of a person whose property he or she has a legal duty to protect. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.
(2) A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force only if he or she reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.
 
you've proven my point and thank you...

you may not use deadly force...

do you actually read what i say and what you post?
 
+Justice said:
you've proven my point and thank you...

you may not use deadly force...

do you actually read what i say and what you post?

You have not proven anything and you do have the right.

And it not just above what I posted that gives you the right to protect your property with deadly force but you have the stand your ground law. If this guy is breaking into my car and I come upon the person he is a potential threat to my life and I have the right to take the person down.

Just like these looters are a danger to peoples lives they should be shot on sight for there rioting and looting of peoples property.
 
And a better analogy would be if you find someone trying to break into your home. I have the above law quoted. Stand your ground law. The castle doctrine. I don't even need to say anything. I can shoot the second they try and turn the handle on my home or business.
 
776.031Use or threatened use of force in defense of property.—
(1)A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on, or other tortious or criminal interference with, either real property other than a dwelling or personal property, lawfully in his or her possession or in the possession of another who is a member of his or her immediate family or household or of a person whose property he or she has a legal duty to protect. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.
(2)A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force only if he or she reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.

defending yourself and your dwelling is totally different from what my analogy is pointing out... if a business is closed then there's nobody in it and no one is in danger... you cannot expect the cops to shoot and kill people that break into businesses after hours, it's called the judiciary system... you get arrested and tried in court...
 
+Justice said:
776.031Use or threatened use of force in defense of property.—
(1)A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on, or other tortious or criminal interference with, either real property other than a dwelling or personal property, lawfully in his or her possession or in the possession of another who is a member of his or her immediate family or household or of a person whose property he or she has a legal duty to protect. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.
(2)A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force only if he or she reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.

defending yourself and your dwelling is totally different from what my analogy is pointing out... if a business is closed then there's nobody in it and no one is in danger... you cannot expect the cops to shoot and kill people that break into businesses after hours, it's called the judiciary system... you get arrested and tried in court...

Your analogy doesn't hold up. I'm threatened and standing my ground as someone is breaking into my car.

And everyone is dangerous when people are looting, rioting, burning and throwing Molotov coaktails. No one is in some of the businesses because they left for fear of there lives. You shoot those kind of people to stop the violence and clear threats to peoples lives.
 
how are you physically threatened just because someone is breaking into your car?

the looters weren't dangerous nor violent towards other people, they were just breaking and entering as well as stealing... that's not in any way, shape or form a threat to the police that would justify lethal force...

you've forgotten the big picture here i believe...

this has been boiling for some time now and more and more people are waking up to the enslavement, the police, the government corruption, no jobs, high unemployment, high homelessness, rights being stripped away, the lies and deceit, unjust laws, unjust law enforcement practices, unjust jails and prisons, unjust system, unjust taxes, unjust exemptions, unjust monitory system, etc. etc. etc. and the cop thugs are brainwashed, trained and programmed that they are against the public...

if you think that's a okay then you have lost your mind son...
 
+Justice said:
how are you physically threatened just because someone is breaking into your car?

the looters weren't dangerous nor violent towards other people, they were just breaking and entering as well as stealing... that's not in any way, shape or form a threat to the police that would justify lethal force...

you've forgotten the big picture here i believe...

this has been boiling for some time now and more and more people are waking up to the enslavement, the police, the government corruption, no jobs, high unemployment, high homelessness, rights being stripped away, the lies and deceit, unjust laws, unjust law enforcement practices, unjust jails and prisons, unjust system, unjust taxes, unjust exemptions, unjust monitory system, etc. etc. etc. and the cop thugs are brainwashed, trained and programmed that they are against the public...

if you think that's a okay then you have lost your mind son...


You said if I come up on a person breaking into my car. If he is breaking into my car he is a physical threat towards me and I feel endangered right there if I made no other move. Specially when I am going to proceed to stop the person.

But they were dangerous and violent. Otherwise businesses like McDonald's would be open instead of boarded up and closed. Businesses wouldn't be scared to come back right now and begin to rebuild. And the piece of crap who got shot would not have thrown around the store employee like a rag doll. Cops would not have been attacked by rocks and Molotov cocktails.

There is no bigger picture. If they are so angry against the man, the oppresser they would be going after the police and the police stations. But they are cowards and don't give a rats ass about all the lives they ruined. The people struggling to keep a business afloat. The employee who now can't make rent because of those losers actions. There lives are far more important to keep intact then the thieving and violent.. Well I won't say the n word. And this includes any white trash involved also.
 
People who are breaking and entering along with looting don't take kindly to anyone who tries to prevent them from carrying on. So you are quite likely to get attacked when you confront and attempt to stop them. The act of looting along with breaking and entering might not be a threat to your life but it oftentimes will lead to such actions that are a threat to your life.

The only reason I could figure as to why you see black people doing this but not any other group to the extent that you see is because black people see each race as a collective group including their own while the other races see each race as being a group of individuals where each person is responsible for their own actions and you don't blame all of one race on the acts of one person that belongs to that race. Perhaps if blacks stopped doing that then they would solve a lot of their own problems they bring upon themselves? Just a thought...
 
Smooth said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
You said if I come up on a person breaking into my car. If he is breaking into my car he is a physical threat towards me and I feel endangered right there if I made no other move. Specially when I am going to proceed to stop the person.

But they were dangerous and violent. Otherwise businesses like McDonald's would be open instead of boarded up and closed. Businesses wouldn't be scared to come back right now and begin to rebuild. And the piece of crap who got shot would not have thrown around the store employee like a rag doll. Cops would not have been attacked by rocks and Molotov cocktails.

There is no bigger picture. If they are so angry against the man, the oppresser they would be going after the police and the police stations. But they are cowards and don't give a rats ass about all the lives they ruined. The people struggling to keep a business afloat. The employee who now can't make rent because of those losers actions. There lives are far more important to keep intact then the thieving and violent.. Well I won't say the n word. And this includes any white trash involved also.

BRAVO!!! Thanks for putting my own thoughts so neatly and clearly into a couple paragraphs. I have witnessed the very things you describe here, particularly this:

If they are so angry against the man, the oppresser they would be going after the police and the police stations. But they are cowards and don't give a rats ass about all the lives they ruined.

They most certainly do not care about anything other than causing as much violence and chaos and stupidity as they possibly can.

(Did you laugh at that pup calling you "son" like I did?)


You are welcome. I am sick and tired about the rotten and what could not be a more stupid excuse for there violence. People are giving pity to the thugs when its the true innocence who work hard everyday that has had there lives shattered in that town. How about all those protesters get off there lazy and whining asses and make a contribution to society and get a job!

I missed the son part. But that is funny.
 
Bluezone777 said:
People who are breaking and entering along with looting don't take kindly to anyone who tries to prevent them from carrying on. So you are quite likely to get attacked when you confront and attempt to stop them. The act of looting along with breaking and entering might not be a threat to your life but it oftentimes will lead to such actions that are a threat to your life.

The only reason I could figure as to why you see black people doing this but not any other group to the extent that you see is because black people see each race as a collective group including their own while the other races see each race as being a group of individuals where each person is responsible for their own actions and you don't blame all of one race on the acts of one person that belongs to that race. Perhaps if blacks stopped doing that then they would solve a lot of their own problems they bring upon themselves? Just a thought...

Thats why I would expect the national guard to take out every person that attempts to break into a business and steal whats NOT theirs. What would have been good also is if the business owners would have stood together all armed with the employees to defend whats theirs.

Agreed.
 
TRUE LIBERTY said:
+Justice said:
how are you physically threatened just because someone is breaking into your car?

the looters weren't dangerous nor violent towards other people, they were just breaking and entering as well as stealing... that's not in any way, shape or form a threat to the police that would justify lethal force...

you've forgotten the big picture here i believe...

this has been boiling for some time now and more and more people are waking up to the enslavement, the police, the government corruption, no jobs, high unemployment, high homelessness, rights being stripped away, the lies and deceit, unjust laws, unjust law enforcement practices, unjust jails and prisons, unjust system, unjust taxes, unjust exemptions, unjust monitory system, etc. etc. etc. and the cop thugs are brainwashed, trained and programmed that they are against the public...

if you think that's a okay then you have lost your mind son...


You said if I come up on a person breaking into my car. If he is breaking into my car he is a physical threat towards me and I feel endangered right there if I made no other move. Specially when I am going to proceed to stop the person.
He is NOT a physical threat to you as he is not causing yourself any harm, even though he is committing a crime... you do have the right to try to stop the person and protect your property, and if the person does turn and goes after you then you'd be defending yourself, which is justified... if you catch someone breaking into your car and just simply bang bang their brains out, then it's all on you and it's a hit or miss that the police will arrest you or not... some might say that you shouldn't have made contact and just called the police, then you wouldn't have put yourself in that situation, but others might say that it's your right to protect your property...

But they were dangerous and violent. Otherwise businesses like McDonald's would be open instead of boarded up and closed. Businesses wouldn't be scared to come back right now and begin to rebuild. And the piece of crap who got shot would not have thrown around the store employee like a rag doll. Cops would not have been attacked by rocks and Molotov cocktails.
who were dangerous and violent? it seems to me that the police were the only ones that were dangerous and violent towards peaceful protesters, including white people, women and children... the robbery had nothing to do with the cop harassing him and shooting him... and where do you get your information from? let me guess? cnn or fox news? it's a fact that the police got attacked by some people AFTER innocent white and black people, women and children that were peacefully protesting got ATTACKED by grenades...

There is no bigger picture. If they are so angry against the man, the oppresser they would be going after the police and the police stations. But they are cowards and don't give a rats ass about all the lives they ruined. The people struggling to keep a business afloat. The employee who now can't make rent because of those losers actions. There lives are far more important to keep intact then the thieving and violent.. Well I won't say the n word. And this includes any white trash involved also.
if you don't see a problem then you'll realize it after cops break down your door and kill you... they were peacefully protesting against police brutality in america, and they got attacked by the cops for which they were protesting against... are you blind? and it's not the first time the police brutality attacked peaceful protesters that were protesting against other issues, so this is not a black vs the police thing, it's the cops vs americans thing, and those thugs are winning the fight because people like you want it to continue until it happens to you or your loved ones... and i'm pretty sure you're a racist... you have much hate in you i see...

Bluezone777 said:
People who are breaking and entering along with looting don't take kindly to anyone who tries to prevent them from carrying on. So you are quite likely to get attacked when you confront and attempt to stop them. The act of looting along with breaking and entering might not be a threat to your life but it oftentimes will lead to such actions that are a threat to your life.
and i'm pretty sure you have no facts to back this up and you're just saying it out of thin air, right?

The only reason I could figure as to why you see black people doing this but not any other group to the extent that you see is because black people see each race as a collective group including their own while the other races see each race as being a group of individuals where each person is responsible for their own actions and you don't blame all of one race on the acts of one person that belongs to that race. Perhaps if blacks stopped doing that then they would solve a lot of their own problems they bring upon themselves? Just a thought...
now, i agree that a lot of blacks are criminals, but so is a lot of people from all races... with this issue, they didn't care what color the cop was, they just see cops killing people left and right, and it's not just blacks that feel this way, everyone is feeling that the police is out of control... this is more about police brutality than about racism... even though the police have been proven to practice racial profiling, but no one needs to be bothered about that fact...

TRUE LIBERTY said:
Smooth said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
You said if I come up on a person breaking into my car. If he is breaking into my car he is a physical threat towards me and I feel endangered right there if I made no other move. Specially when I am going to proceed to stop the person.

But they were dangerous and violent. Otherwise businesses like McDonald's would be open instead of boarded up and closed. Businesses wouldn't be scared to come back right now and begin to rebuild. And the piece of crap who got shot would not have thrown around the store employee like a rag doll. Cops would not have been attacked by rocks and Molotov cocktails.

There is no bigger picture. If they are so angry against the man, the oppresser they would be going after the police and the police stations. But they are cowards and don't give a rats ass about all the lives they ruined. The people struggling to keep a business afloat. The employee who now can't make rent because of those losers actions. There lives are far more important to keep intact then the thieving and violent.. Well I won't say the n word. And this includes any white trash involved also.

BRAVO!!! Thanks for putting my own thoughts so neatly and clearly into a couple paragraphs. I have witnessed the very things you describe here, particularly this:

If they are so angry against the man, the oppresser they would be going after the police and the police stations. But they are cowards and don't give a rats ass about all the lives they ruined.

They most certainly do not care about anything other than causing as much violence and chaos and stupidity as they possibly can.

(Did you laugh at that pup calling you "son" like I did?)


You are welcome. I am sick and tired about the rotten and what could not be a more stupid excuse for there violence. People are giving pity to the thugs when its the true innocence who work hard everyday that has had there lives shattered in that town. How about all those protesters get off there lazy and whining asses and make a contribution to society and get a job!
and you are trying to defend police thugs that are out there beating up old ladies, children and killing people for no damn reason... see, you're confusing the few bad apples that looted and stole from businesses to the many and many peaceful protesters that rallied up for their cause, which includes white people as well as women and children... the cops hurt innocent women and children when they weren't apart of the looting and thieving...

it's funny, so funny how you say protesting against something is just being lazy and whinny... you're so ignorant of the truth... do you want to know the cold hard facts?

here it goes:

-there's more adult americans than jobs...
-there's also millions of illegal immigrants that are here taking away from those american jobs on top of it...
-less jobs than people equals an guarantee unemployment...
-how can you blame someone that doesn't have a job because there's no jobs for EVERYONE to begin with...
-even college graduates are unemployed due to no jobs out there...

but yeah, they're all no good, lazy and whinny brats... give me a break...


I missed the son part. But that is funny.
son... (;

TRUE LIBERTY said:
Bluezone777 said:
People who are breaking and entering along with looting don't take kindly to anyone who tries to prevent them from carrying on. So you are quite likely to get attacked when you confront and attempt to stop them. The act of looting along with breaking and entering might not be a threat to your life but it oftentimes will lead to such actions that are a threat to your life.

The only reason I could figure as to why you see black people doing this but not any other group to the extent that you see is because black people see each race as a collective group including their own while the other races see each race as being a group of individuals where each person is responsible for their own actions and you don't blame all of one race on the acts of one person that belongs to that race. Perhaps if blacks stopped doing that then they would solve a lot of their own problems they bring upon themselves? Just a thought...

Thats why I would expect the national guard to take out every person that attempts to break into a business and steal whats NOT theirs. What would have been good also is if the business owners would have stood together all armed with the employees to defend whats theirs.
that's not how this country works, though, or it shouldn't be like that... it's called due process, who are you to say that the police and the national guard should be the judge, jury and the executioner for this type of stuff? totally ridiculous... if you like that type of stuff then go be a commie over in china or something... and 'oppressor' has a 'or' not a 'er'... but you'll probably disagree with me on that too...
Agreed.
disagreed... (;
 
+Justice said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:

He is NOT a physical threat to you as he is not causing yourself any harm, even though he is committing a crime... you do have the right to try to stop the person and protect your property, and if the person does turn and goes after you then you'd be defending yourself, which is justified... if you catch someone breaking into your car and just simply bang bang their brains out, then it's all on you and it's a hit or miss that the police will arrest you or not... some might say that you shouldn't have made contact and just called the police, then you wouldn't have put yourself in that situation, but others might say that it's your right to protect your property...



If the person is breaking into my car he is a immediate threat to my life. I have no idea how the person will react and I have no desire to find out. And even more so if my wife and family are with me. But as I said your analogy is very poor.



The solution to prevent these would have been very easy.



Car theft victim left fighting for life after being attacked while confronting men as they stole his Land Rover
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2375135/Car-theft-victim-left-fighting-life-attacked-confronting-men-stole-Land-Rover.html



Car thief caught in the act killed in gun battle with former Marine
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Car-thief-caught-breaking-into-truck-fatally-shot-by-trucks-owner-225020962.html



who were dangerous and violent? it seems to me that the police were the only ones that were dangerous and violent towards peaceful protesters, including white people, women and children... the robbery had nothing to do with the cop harassing him and shooting him... and where do you get your information from? let me guess? cnn or fox news? it's a fact that the police got attacked by some people AFTER innocent white and black people, women and children that were peacefully protesting got ATTACKED by grenades...
Come on that question is just silly asking who were dangerous. Peaceful protesters. LOL! Some attacked police. LOL!

At least 10 people, including three officers, suffered injuries

Ferguson Sunday night when angry MOBS began smashing windows, setting fires and looting businesses in the area.

Police Chief Tom Jackson said someone in a yellow pickup truck fired shots at officers while circling a WalMart parking lot.

Police said shots were also fired at a police helicopter in the area.

According to police, two men were assaulted at a Phillips 66 in the 1100 block of Riverview during the riots.

Police say three suspects used a bat to injury a 54-year-old man who attempted to stop them for leaving the store with stolen merchandise.

According to St. Louis County police, 32 people were arrested Sunday night, 10 for looting and 22 for destruction of property, and 15 people were arrested during a protest in Ferguson Monday morning.

Police also responded to reports of shootings throughout the area. At one point, windows of a News 4 live truck were smashed out by the angry crowd.

One witness told News 4 a group of people attempted to steal an ATM from a gas station.

News video and amateur video from the scene captured mobs of crowds racing into stores and businesses and then rushing out with armloads of stolen goods.

Tuesday night, the unrest continued with five shootings and 12 arrests throughout the St. Louis area. The incidents occurred hours after Rev. Al Sharpton urged for calm throughout the area.

Tuesday night, a woman was taken to an area hospital after being shot in the head by a low caliber bullet, she is expected to survive. Police also transported an 18-year-old, 20-year-old and unidentified person after separate shootings in north St. Louis County and Jennings.

News 4’s Scott Thomas said police showed restraint Wednesday night, but then began to use the tear gas when objects were thrown at them.

Thats right just a peaceful group of tugs and losers and thats only two nights.
if you don't see a problem then you'll realize it after cops break down your door and kill you...

Thats a whole other issue for another topic and I will probably even agree with you on the problems with some of our police force in this country.
they were peacefully protesting against police brutality in america, and they got attacked by the cops for which they were protesting against... are you blind? and it's not the first time the police brutality attacked peaceful protesters that were protesting against other issues, so this is not a black vs the police thing, it's the cops vs americans thing, and those thugs are winning the fight because people like you want it to continue until it happens to you or your loved ones... and i'm pretty sure you're a racist... you have much hate in you i see...
Again just plain silly to say it was peaceful in any way. This violence and looting from this protest is very much a black thing. This video is EPIC on common sense.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5f0mVn0HH6U
and you are trying to defend police thugs that are out there beating up old ladies, children and killing people for no damn reason...



Please! I am very sure there are bad cops doing such things in the country but this is not the case with these riots.
see, you're confusing the few bad apples that looted and stole from businesses to the many and many peaceful protesters that rallied up for their cause, which includes white people as well as women and children... the cops hurt innocent women and children when they weren't apart of the looting and thieving...
No confusion. As stated many times this is not a few bad apples. MLK would have had peaceful protests day and night against these "few" looters and rioters. And he certainly would have not jumped the gun on creating havoc and destroying lives before there was conclusion of facts.
it's funny, so funny how you say protesting against something is just being lazy and whinny... you're so ignorant of the truth... do you want to know the cold hard facts?

here it goes:

-there's more adult americans than jobs...
-there's also millions of illegal immigrants that are here taking away from those american jobs on top of it...
-less jobs than people equals an guarantee unemployment...
-how can you blame someone that doesn't have a job because there's no jobs for EVERYONE to begin with...
-even college graduates are unemployed due to no jobs out there...

but yeah, they're all no good, lazy and whinny brats... give me a break...



If people really want to work they will find a job and not find it below there standards. Government handouts off the backs of others make certain jobs below those standards and just plain easier to whine and protest how bad they have it.



that's not how this country works, though, or it shouldn't be like that... it's called due process, who are you to say that the police and the national guard should be the judge, jury and the executioner for this type of stuff? totally ridiculous... if you like that type of stuff then go be a commie over in china or something... and 'oppressor' has a 'or' not a 'er'... but you'll probably disagree with me on that too...

[/quote]
[/quote]

That is exactly how this country works and became created. Self reliance to protect whats yours against the worst people is the American way. Due process! LOL! So let them destroy peoples lives and dreams first then proceed with justice. What liberal crap.

dFrTvrUnnn.jpg

Michael Calhoun @michaelcalhoun · 12h

Store owners in #Ferguson say they’re going to start defending themselves against looters.
 
you totally disregard truth, facts and common sense...

or, that you can't read what i say and comprehend it for some reason...

due process is liberal crap? since when?

i'm all for protecting yourself and your loved ones, as well as your property...

and i'm totally against people destroying other people's property...

again, those peaceful protesters weren't involved with those that looted and did damage...

the cops shot at the peaceful protesters first, then the cops got attacked by stuff, that's the truth, if you don't like it then tough...

jobs? where are all the jobs at? the economy is in crap, the federal reserve note is in crap, the middle class is in crap, and it's all happening or happened for a reason by the wealthy and the powerful...

you're only watching the media that are giving you half truths and lies...

there were zero accounts of looters and thieves with guns killing people, they were just thugs stealing stuff then leaving... which i don't agree but not punishable by death...
 
+Justice said:
you totally disregard truth, facts and common sense...

or, that you can't read what i say and comprehend it for some reason...

I was thinking the same thing about you I just had the decency until now to leave it out of the discussion. LOL!

due process is liberal crap? since when?

Since protecting peoples livelihoods hoods should come first when in the act of what basically amounts to terrorism. I just love this point made on another forum. We wouldn't permit a foreign enemy to land on our shores and start burning us out.

i'm all for protecting yourself and your loved ones, as well as your property...

Yah I can feel all the concern.

and i'm totally against people destroying other people's property...

Thats what I keep hearing.

again, those peaceful protesters weren't involved with those that looted and did damage...

But yet they did little to stop it or support the cops to help the destruction end. They are like all the millions of quiet Muslims who do not participate in terrorism but behind the scenes they are rooting it on.

the cops shot at the peaceful protesters first, then the cops got attacked by stuff, that's the truth, if you don't like it then tough...

Spare me this kind of nonsense to justify burning down a town. Cops have no desire to shoot innocence. The losers in that town started the massacre of a town first. Our government did not have the balls to stop it the very first night by using deadly force. Then those "peaceful" crowds could have safely protested about what at this point I have no idea because no concrete facts have been released yet.

jobs? where are all the jobs at? the economy is in crap, the federal reserve note is in crap, the middle class is in crap, and it's all happening or happened for a reason by the wealthy and the powerful...

You are correct the economy is crap. But if people truly want a job they are out there even if it is below there standards. I started off in life a high school dropout, homeless and picking up trash for a company and worked my way up to having my own successful business. Taking a government handout is much easier then struggling to make something for your future. Its all excuses and crying to be lazy and dependent.

you're only watching the media that are giving you half truths and lies...

Whatever. LOL! You are making assumptions where I get my info because you do not like my answers.

there were zero accounts of looters and thieves with guns killing people, they were just thugs stealing stuff then leaving... which i don't agree but not punishable by death...

So? And none of the accounts I posted above said there was death from it. But people did get shot and seriously hurt. And I disagree. I value the business owners and employees of those store FAR, FAR, FAR more then I do any of the looters and rioters.
 
all of your "replies" to my words are so very sad...

just want you to know that...
 

Create an account or login to post a reply

You must be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Create an account here on Off Topix. It's quick & easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Theme customizations unavailable!

    Theme customization fields are not available to you, please contact the administrator for more information.

  • Choose the color combination that reflects your taste
    Background images
    Color gradient backgrounds
Back