What's new
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Holder Mum On Potential Petraeus Indictment

Webster

Retired Snark Master
Administrator
Joined
May 11, 2013
Posts
25,138
Reaction score
13,683
Points
2,870
....given the proclivities of the current administration, it wouldn't surprise me if Atty.Gen. Just Us didn't approve an indictment agst. Gen. Petraeus....
Attorney General Eric Holder declined to say on Sunday whether U.S. prosecutors have recommended felony charges against ex-CIA Director Gen. David Petraeus for allegedly disclosing government secrets, but downplayed a news report stating the federal probe is complete, as Senate leaders rally to support the ex-military leader.

Petraeus resigned from the CIA in 2012 after a federal investigation found he was having an extramarital affair with biographer Paula Broadwell and concluded he gave her classified information.

Holder told ABC’s “This Week” that news reports based on information leaked by anonymous sources are “frequently inaccurate” and assured members of Congress that Petraeus would be treated fairly.

“I share their concern and assure them and the rest of America that any investigation will be done in a fair and appropriate way” said Holder, the country’s top law enforcement official.

Holder, who last year announced he would retire after President Obama found his replacement, did not say whether the Petraeus case would be concluded under him.

The New York Times reported Friday that Justice Department prosecutors and the FBI are recommending the charges against Petraeus -- a retried, four star Army general.

GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham and John McCain acknowledged on Saturday that the facts related to the federal investigation remain unknown, so they cannot comment on the specifics. But they said, “It is clear that this investigation has been grievously mishandled.”

"It is outrageous that the highly confidential and law-enforcement-sensitive recommendation of prosecutors to bring charges against General Petraeus was leaked," Graham, S.C., and McCain, Ariz., also said in a joint statement. "No American deserves such callous treatment, let alone one of America’s finest military leaders.”

They were joined Sunday by Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “He [Petraeus] made a bad mistake,” Feinstein told Fox News on Sunday. “He lost his job as the CIA director. And at some point enough is enough.”

She also couldn’t comment on an investigation, but called Petraeus a “true patriot” and expressed hope that the Justice Department would not bring charges. Petraeus has denied giving Broadwell classified information and reportedly is not interested in a plea deal.

North Carolina GOP Sen. Richard Burr told ABC on Sunday that he trusts the FBI in doing its investigation. However, he raised the issue of Obama saying when announcing Petraeus’ resignation that his actions did not reach the level of putting national security in jeopardy. “The burden of proof is on the bureau and Justice Department … to present to Americans where [the breach] was and why the president was wrong,” Burr said. (Fox News)
 
They will not prosecute. He was in charge of the CIA which means he knows things about our dear leader and company that they would not like to get out into the public. It will remain a stalemate.
 
TRUE LIBERTY said:
They will not prosecute. He was in charge of the CIA which means he knows things about our dear leader and company that they would not like to get out into the public. It will remain a stalemate.

The reverse could also happen...they could prosecute, hoping to get a conviction which would effectively shut Petraeus up because to most people, a convicted felon's word means squadoosh nowadays.
 
Webster said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
They will not prosecute. He was in charge of the CIA which means he knows things about our dear leader and company that they would not like to get out into the public. It will remain a stalemate.

The reverse could also happen...they could prosecute, hoping to get a conviction which would effectively shut Petraeus up because to most people, a convicted felon's word means squadoosh nowadays.

If a ex cia boss makes a damaging claim and can offer up evidence the people and press are going to listen. You do not get to that level without protecting yourself.
 

Create an account or login to post a reply

You must be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Create an account here on Off Topix. It's quick & easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom