What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

IB (vBulletin owner) Sold

Nebulous's iconNebulous

Founder of Off Topix
Elite Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Posts
82,850
OT Bucks
157,799
Article: http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/20/private-equity-firm-acquires-internet-brands-in-640-million-deal/



Internet media company Internet Brands this morning announced that it has entered into a definitive merger agreement to be acquired by an affiliate of private equity investment firm Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VI in a transaction valued at approximately $640 million.



Under the terms of the agreement, stockholders of NASDAQ-listed Internet Brands will receive $13.35 in cash for each outstanding share of common stock they own, a premium of approximately 46.5% over the closing price last Friday.



Internet Brands owns and operates more than 100 vertical websites, including Autos.com, Gardens.com, Loan.com and DoItYourself.com. In total, Internet Brands claims these sites organically attract approximately 62 million unique visitors per month.



The company was founded in 1998 by business incubator Idealab.



When the company last posted its financial results, it reported revenues of $28.1 million in the second quarter of this year and net income of $4.6 million in second quarter.



Idealab, which beneficially owns approximately 19% of Internet Brands’ outstanding common stock and approximately 64% of the voting power of the company, has entered into a voting agreement with an affiliate of Hellman & Friedman relating to the merger agreement.



The merger deal is subject to stockholder approval, including approval by holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock not owned by Idealab and other parties, and customary closing conditions. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2010.



Debt financing commitments have been provided by Bank of America, N.A., BMO Capital Markets, GE Capital and RBC Capital Markets.



Update: Internet Brands CEO Bob Brisco blogson INET going private again:



We became a public company three years ago, just as the global financial markets began to falter—and ultimately crater. We’ve prospered, despite the most difficult economic, financial, and advertising market backdrop in about 85 years.



We take pride in our NASDAQ performance and shareholder returns. At the $13.35 offer price, our stock would have appreciated roughly 67% from our IPO. That compares to an overall NASDAQ decline during the same period of roughly -10%. Our management team is proud of our performance and I am proud of them. We are blessed with a great team.



So, why potentially go private again? Because we believe this would be a good deal for our shareholders. Because we would continue to build one of the finest New Media companies in the world and become even more focused on long-term growth. Because H&F would be a great partner.



Update 2: Law firm Levi & Korsinsky is already announcing that they’ll investigate if the Board of Directors has breached its fiduciary duties to stockholders by “failing to adequately shop the Company” before entering into this transaction.



vBulletin customers discuss this matter here, wondering what's going to happen next; http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/show...lman-amp-Friedman-Stockholders-for-640million
 
Guess nobody cares.. I dont really care either actually.
tongue.gif
 
Who does? They're a company looking for your money and that only. That's why their market share will be reduced very quickly soon enough.
 
Nebulous said:
Guess nobody cares.. I dont really care either actually.
tongue.gif



I don't care either. I used to be a co-administrator on a religious site that was run off of Vbulletin, and I was not too pleased with the experience. ACP is way too advanced for my liking, and it was just downright nuts. Now days, I wouldn't mind being a co-administrator on a PHPBB or IPB forum even, but never again will I work for a Vbulletin ran forum. I was, however, relieved that the administrator didn't have me add or remove forums (can't remember if I had founder access at the time or not) but if he did, I probably would've had a nervous breakdown just trying to find my way around the ACP. Actually, to my knowledge, while I've only used the free version of IPB before it went under, I seem to remember that IPB's ACP was a tad confusing as well.
 
@Ashley, I run a vBulletin forum. I remember when I first started working with it back when it was still version 3.8 and I have to say I was clueless when it came to every aspect of the ACP but after around a week I knew all the basics and now I can pretty much do anything that is needed in the ACP. My point is that at first, if you have no experience with it then its quite confusing but very easy to learn if you some time into it. I have also used phpBB and IPB in the past and honestly vBulletin was the easiest for me to learn, to be fair though I was kind of inexperienced with forums when I used phpBB.
 
The ACP of vB isnt the purpose of this topic. Regardless, I found it easy to use.
 
Back
Top Bottom