IRS hires loser firm

[DrLeftover]

IRS Has Active Contract For MILLIONS With Company HHS FIRED Over Botched Healthcare.gov
21 Jan

Seven months after federal officials fired CGI Federal for its botched work on Obamacare website Healthcare.gov, the IRS awarded the same company a $4.5 million IT contract for its new Obamacare tax program.

CGI is a $10.5 billion Montreal-based company that has forever been etched into the public’s mind as the company behind the bungled Obamacare main website.

After facing a year of embarrassing failures, federal officials finally pulled the plug on the company and terminated CGI’s contract in January 2014.

Yet on Aug. 11, seven months later, IRS officials signed a new contract with CGI to provide “critical functions” and “management support” for its Obamacare tax program, according to the Federal Procurement Data System, a federal government procurement database.

The IRS contract is worth $4.46 million, according to the FPDS data. The contract expires Aug. 15, 2015.

Prior to terminating CGI’s contract, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told Congress, “I am as frustrated and angry as anyone with the flawed launch of HealthCare.gov.” She called the CGI-designed website a “debacle.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/bombshell-irs-has-active-contract-for-millions-with-company-hhs-fired-over-botched-healthcare-gov/

 

[Webster]

...that is all.

 

[+paradox]

cgi federal? actually named the company that?

what? why? to try to pass as an official government agency or something?

to portray that you're some sort of authority or importance?

screw you cgi federal and you too irs...  

 

[Webster]

screw you cgi federal and you too irs... [/font][/size]

...damn, Freezy and I have something in common...

 

[+paradox]

@webster, it's hard to not agree with truth...

but for some, it's easy, and then i tell them this:

 

[Webster]

@webster, it's hard to not agree with truth...

Once in a while, we actually do agree on things....shocking, I know, isn't it?

 

[DrLeftover]

Wait a minute.

All THREE of us share the same opinion.

 

[Webster]

Wait a minute.

All THREE of us share the same opinion.

Yeah, we all do this time....

 

[+paradox]

even @drleftover is having fun with gifs!

life is good now!

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

My god! Make that four people!

 

[+paradox]

My god! Make that four people!

 

[DrLeftover]

-30-

 

[Webster]

even @drleftover is having fun with gifs!

life is good now!

No kidding, Freeze...

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

-30-

What does that mean?

 

[+paradox]

-30-

What does that mean?

it means that he's drunk...

 

[Nebulous]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9330%E2%80%93

–30– has been traditionally used by journalists to indicate the end of a story. It is commonly found at the end of a press release. There are many theories about how the usage came into being, e.g. from that number's use in the 92 Code of telegraphic shorthand to signify the end of a transmission in the American Civil War era. In another theory, the "-30-" originated when stories were written in longhand; X marked the end of a sentence, XX the end of a paragraph, and XXX meant the end of a story. (The Roman numerals XXX equate to 30.)

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9330%E2%80%93

–30– has been traditionally used by journalists to indicate the end of a story. It is commonly found at the end of a press release. There are many theories about how the usage came into being, e.g. from that number's use in the 92 Code of telegraphic shorthand to signify the end of a transmission in the American Civil War era. In another theory, the "-30-" originated when stories were written in longhand; X marked the end of a sentence, XX the end of a paragraph, and XXX meant the end of a story. (The Roman numerals XXX equate to 30.)

Thank you!

 

[+paradox]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9330%E2%80%93

–30– has been traditionally used by journalists to indicate the end of a story. It is commonly found at the end of a press release. There are many theories about how the usage came into being, e.g. from that number's use in the 92 Code of telegraphic shorthand to signify the end of a transmission in the American Civil War era. In another theory, the "-30-" originated when stories were written in longhand; X marked the end of a sentence, XX the end of a paragraph, and XXX meant the end of a story. (The Roman numerals XXX equate to 30.)

well, i could have told him that but what's the fun in that?

but i do must point out that he used a -30- and not a –30–, which means different things to different people...

 

[Webster]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9330%E2%80%93

–30– has been traditionally used by journalists to indicate the end of a story. It is commonly found at the end of a press release. There are many theories about how the usage came into being, e.g. from that number's use in the 92 Code of telegraphic shorthand to signify the end of a transmission in the American Civil War era. In another theory, the "-30-" originated when stories were written in longhand; X marked the end of a sentence, XX the end of a paragraph, and XXX meant the end of a story. (The Roman numerals XXX equate to 30.)

well, i could have told him that but what's the fun it that?

but i do must point out that he used a -30- and not a –30–, which means different things to different people...

-30- , –30–....what's the difference?!?

 

[+paradox]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9330%E2%80%93

–30– has been traditionally used by journalists to indicate the end of a story. It is commonly found at the end of a press release. There are many theories about how the usage came into being, e.g. from that number's use in the 92 Code of telegraphic shorthand to signify the end of a transmission in the American Civil War era. In another theory, the "-30-" originated when stories were written in longhand; X marked the end of a sentence, XX the end of a paragraph, and XXX meant the end of a story. (The Roman numerals XXX equate to 30.)

well, i could have told him that but what's the fun it that?

but i do must point out that he used a -30- and not a –30–, which means different things to different people...

-30- ,  –30–....what's the difference?!?  

for one, difference characters are involved...