Jolly Fisherman loses his welcome in 'health and safety' redesign

[Jazzy]

A planned new statue of the Jolly Fisherman, mascot of Skegness, has been criticised as “ugly” after it was redesigned due to health and safety concerns.



For more than 100 years he has been greeting visitors to the seaside with his arms outstretched in welcome.



But now the Jolly Fisherman, the mascot of Skegness since 1908, has been ordered to adopt a less exuberant pose - on “health and safety” grounds.

The design for a new statue on the town’s station plaza portrays the fisherman with his arms clamped by his sides, holding a beach ball and patting a seal pup.



Council chiefs said the change was necessary to prevent children swinging on the arms, getting hurt and claiming compensation.



But they have agreed to reconsider the design after critics called it “ugly” and compared it to Buddha or a gargoyle.



Mark Anderson, the mayor of Skegness, said: “We don’t want people to make a farce of our logo and our town, and this to me is a farce.”



Anita Ruffle, a senior manager at Lincolnshire county council, said: “We are trying to keep his arms in because we did feel there was the issue of health and safety.”



A council spokesman said the aim was to avoid a design which would “entice children or whoever to swing on the arms of the statue, which might lead to some claims”.

Source with pictures



What a waste of money. All they have to do is put up a sign with a warning: Anyone who swings on the statue does so at their own risk.

 

[DrLeftover]

There is legal precedence that at your own risk warnings are not sufficient to prevent lawsuits.



The definition:

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/foreseeable+risk





The application of same:

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123892&page=1

 

[Jazzy]

Anita Ruffle, a senior manager at Lincolnshire county council, said: “We are trying to keep his arms in because we did feel there was the issue of health and safety.”



A council spokesman said the aim was to avoid a design which would “entice children or whoever to swing on the arms of the statue, which might lead to some claims”.

Give me a break. this statue has been there for over 100 years. Just how many claims have been made? Don't they also feel that all trees should be cut down too? Don't tree limbs entice children or whoever to swing on the arms (limbs)? *Sighs with sarcasm and disgust*