What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

"Like" this if you "like" that....

You have some �s again (on that note, might I ask what program you're using to create these pages?), also your Zwinky link is broken because you didn't append the .htm part.



Isn't it interesting how that exterminate-it site also uses Google Analytics?

Bit of a depressing bottom line.
 
Interesting...

In that case, you're also missing a in your second meta tag.

Is there any particular reason you use non-breaking spaces instead of margins or text-indents?
 
Well, looking at the current standards there are a lot of things I could complain about
tongue.png




Such things aside, you have two strange

s around your </body> and (I just had to google it) the <blackface> tag doesn't do anything except in one browser I've never heard of.
 
I do That.



And then This comes out:



The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has claimed that agents do not need warrants to read people's emails, text messages and other private electronic communications, according to internal agency documents.



The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which obtained the documents through a Freedom of Information Act request, released the information on Wednesday.



In a 2009 handbook, the IRS said the Fourth Amendment does not protect emails because Internet users do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such communications. A 2010 presentation by the IRS Office of General Counsel reiterated the policy.



Under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986, government officials only need a subpoena, issued without a judge's approval, to read emails that have been opened or that are more than 180 days old.



http://thehill.com/b...thout-a-warrant
 
Time to encrypt your emails. Oh and protest of course.



do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such communications. Well no, not if the IRS is reading them.
 
RE: "Like" this if you "like" that....

Just so you know...

By browsing our site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Cookies are tiny bits of data websites store in your web browser to make your online experience better

http://web.orange.co.uk/p/news/


And then.... go look at exactly what they, and their advertisers, and ap people, and so on, are "storing in your browser".

Oh yes.
 
RE: "Like" this if you "like" that....

DrLeftover said:
So... ahhh... no dissenting opinions about the references or conclusions in the article?
Well, I'm one of those people who blocks cookies. (With some exceptions obviously.)
Though very useful and technically harmless, I don't need them cluttering up my computer and I don't need them for uses that aren't useful to me. Advertisers can damn well use their computers to store information about me.
 
Back
Top Bottom