"Like" this if you "like" that....

[DrLeftover]

... and if you do, you probably won't like this:



http://themediadesk.com/files8/online.htm

 

[Evil Eye]

You have some �s again (on that note, might I ask what program you're using to create these pages?), also your Zwinky link is broken because you didn't append the .htm part.



Isn't it interesting how that exterminate-it site also uses Google Analytics?

Bit of a depressing bottom line.

 

[DrLeftover]

I'll check the errors... they're probably smart quotes that got through.



And I'll fix the link.



The program I use is me, typing code.



I don't like WYSIWYG editors.

 

[Evil Eye]

Interesting...

In that case, you're also missing a in your second meta tag.

Is there any particular reason you use non-breaking spaces instead of margins or text-indents?

 

[DrLeftover]

Habit.



How about now.... the graphic at the bottom of the page is even back.



Had to go turn off a couple more automatic features in Word.



And thanks for the head's up on the errors.

 

[Evil Eye]

Well, looking at the current standards there are a lot of things I could complain about

Such things aside, you have two strange

s around your </body> and (I just had to google it) the <blackface> tag doesn't do anything except in one browser I've never heard of.

 

[DrLeftover]

I do That.



And then This comes out:

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has claimed that agents do not need warrants to read people's emails, text messages and other private electronic communications, according to internal agency documents.



The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which obtained the documents through a Freedom of Information Act request, released the information on Wednesday.



In a 2009 handbook, the IRS said the Fourth Amendment does not protect emails because Internet users do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such communications. A 2010 presentation by the IRS Office of General Counsel reiterated the policy.



Under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986, government officials only need a subpoena, issued without a judge's approval, to read emails that have been opened or that are more than 180 days old.

http://thehill.com/b...thout-a-warrant

 

[Evil Eye]

Time to encrypt your emails. Oh and protest of course.



do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such communications. Well no, not if the IRS is reading them.

 

[DrLeftover]

RE: "Like" this if you "like" that....

So... ahhh... no dissenting opinions about the references or conclusions in the article?

Just the formatting errors and obsolete <blackface> tag?

 

[DrLeftover]

RE: "Like" this if you "like" that....

Just so you know...

By browsing our site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Cookies are tiny bits of data websites store in your web browser to make your online experience better

http://web.orange.co.uk/p/news/


And then.... go look at exactly what they, and their advertisers, and ap people, and so on, are "storing in your browser".

Oh yes.

 

[Evil Eye]

RE: "Like" this if you "like" that....

So... ahhh... no dissenting opinions about the references or conclusions in the article?

Well, I'm one of those people who blocks cookies. (With some exceptions obviously.)
Though very useful and technically harmless, I don't need them cluttering up my computer and I don't need them for uses that aren't useful to me. Advertisers can damn well use their computers to store information about me.

 

[DrLeftover]

RE: "Like" this if you "like" that....

I have been blocking third party cookies for years. And script. And pop ups, tracking....


And I don't feel like I've missed anything on the web.

Oh, well