What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Michael Brown was shot numerous times

Jazzy

Wild Thing
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
79,918
OT Bucks
308,926
An unarmed black teenager killed by a white police officer in Missouri was shot at least six times, including twice in the head, a preliminary private autopsy has found, according to The New York Times.

The newspaper reports that the autopsy by Dr. Michael Baden, a former New York City chief medical examiner, found that one of the bullets entered the top of Michael Brown's skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when he suffered a fatal injury.

Baden said it was likely the last of bullets to hit Brown, 18, whose death has spurred a week of rancorous protests in Ferguson, in suburban St. Louis.

Dr. Lawrence Koblinsky, a forensic science expert and a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, told "CBS This Morning" that probably the most important detail from the release is that Brown was shot entirely in the front of his body.

"That is, the story of the eyewitness, the friend of Michael Brown, Dorian Johnson, was that he had been running away from the vehicle and a shot was fired. That apparently is false. He was not shot in the back," Koblinsky said.

The forensic scientist also said it is important to note where exactly Brown was first shot.

"It's my opinion that seeing four shots to the right arm was an indication to me that the police officer wanted to stop him," Koblinsky said.

The likely fatal blow to the top of the head of Brown told Koblinsky that "he was either falling and the shot was fired or he was charging and the shot was fired."

However, Koblinsky added later that "six shots is five shots too many," because officers should be better trained at stopping suspects without lethal force.

Full article

Statement from Benjamin Crump, a lawyer for Brown's family:
"We want to make sure people understand what this case is about: This case is about a police officer executing a young unarmed man in broad daylight."

Do you agree with Benjamin Crump's statement?
 
not entirely. i'm feeling like there's a lot missing from both sides of the story. brown was a very big boy and apparently a bit of a thug. the ferguson PD is almost entirely white and has a history of difficulty recruiting and holding onto black police officers. ferguson is mostly black and the racial tension between the people and the police was running very high at the time of the shooting.

i think koblinsky's assessment of the four arm shots is in error. you don't stop a huge dude by shooting him in the arm . aim low for the legs. perhaps the cop was just a shitty marksman and couldn't hit the kill zone?

making a big deal out of the fact that he was unarmed is a bit of a diversion. the kid was huge. i'm only half his size and when i was young, the cops handled me with great care and caution because they knew that i was trained and capable in unarmed combat. they still put on the rubber gloves when they come back from running my ID after reading whatever the hell the feds flagged my file with.
 
Back
Top Bottom