The Republic of Ireland may vote this week to abolish its upper house of parliament, the Seanad. It is a move favoured by most political parties and opinion polls suggest the public mainly support abolition too, but are the Irish people fed up with their senators - or with the political class as a whole?
No respectable pollster would accept a survey of voting intentions conducted solely at Listowel racecourse in County Kerry. As an indication of what is likely to happen in Friday's referendum, it lacks scientific rigour.
But what is striking is the unvarying nature of the opinions punters offer about the Seanad. Time and again - whatever their age or gender or party allegiance - they say they have no idea what the Seanad exists to do. At times the tone is bitterly hostile.
National opinion polls also suggest a majority in favour of getting rid of Ireland's 60-seat upper house.
'Rest home'
In Listowel, a quartet of female race-goers sip coffee and watch keenly as the first horses of the day parade around the paddock. It is obvious a very Irish love of horses and the turf is part of their lives.
Without exception they query what role the Seanad has in modern Irish society, especially after several years of painful economic struggle.
The four share much the same list of complaints:
the Seanad is a rest home for people who could not get into the Dail (the main chamber of parliament) or who have been kicked out of it
it is stuffed with the useless cronies of the powerful
it is undemocratic and a scandalous waste of money
The best anyone has to say is that the Seanad might be worth keeping - if everything about it were reformed from top to bottom.
This week's referendum is obligatory as abolition would mean altering the country's constitution. There is also a second question about a new court of appeal. Critics say the Seanad currently costs 20m euros (£17m; $27m) a year to run. Supporters say the true figure is nearer 7m euros.
"By international standards that figure may not sound very much either way," says Professor Michael Gallagher of the Department of Political Science at Trinity College Dublin.
"But though people tend to mention the cost as what they most object to, I think there's something even more basic underneath.
"When the Taoiseach [Prime Minister], Enda Kenny, was in opposition he put forward this referendum as a populist move. The government has presented it as a chance to cut the numbers of politicians. In an era when Ireland is not in love with its politicians, the idea seems to have hit home."
