Reason #I've Lost Count On Why You Should Never Be Kind To A Leftist

[Webster]

....this is yet another reason why I'm no longer a lefty liberal: many of them are downright jerks!

(Gay Patriot) A Subway officer was kind enough to let Lesbian Intellectual Jackass Extraordinaire Sally Kohn ride the subway even though she forgot her wallet. She thanked him by calling him a racist.

Forgot my wallet. MTA officer let me on subway for free. #classprivilege #whiteprivilege (Sally Kohn, 7 May 2015)

So, the lesson here is, leftists are ungrateful jerks.

 

[mrldii]

Guess it balances out the *right*ists being pompous asses, then.

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

....this is yet another reason why I'm no longer a lefty liberal: many of them are downright jerks!

She is not only a leftist but a femanazi. But that is a leftist thinking, somehow somewhere someone is making to much, being to nice, loving someone to much, buying something someone else can't, going somewhere someone else wants to. And dammit as long as there is one person not getting one of those things others are to blame for it and specially we white folks for that lack of equality.

 

[Dee]

We know, we know. You like to circle jerk all over pictures of your most favuhrit cumservatives. Get onto posting with your next thread pissing and moaning about how one side is the main problem with this country.

 

[mrldii]

What's a "femanazi"?

 

[Bluezone777]

I have a few questions; Why should you need a reason to be kind to someone? Shouldn't you just be kind to someone because that's just your nature? Why should they have to agree with you on politics before being kind to them? Why should it matter if they respond to your kindness with hostility or kindness? How does their response to your kindness effect whether it was right or wrong to be kind? What makes you think your thoughts or ideas on anything will ever even be remotely considered if you respond to one person's hostility with some of your own? Wouldn't the likely outcome that they would become less willing not more willing to even consider you if you intend to throw back what you get.

Here's a thought, let's dump all these labels and start looking at people as people and not through the lens of made up labels which obscure the value of others and make discussing the issues of the day harder then they need to be.

One last thing, the more I see threads like this, the harder it will be for others to even be willing to consider anything said in them because the people in question have shown repeatedly that they have no interest in considering anything that isn't centered around their beliefs so it's pointless to reply to them as they will outright refuse to consider other people's thoughts and therefore prevent any meaningful discussion from occurring. This may sound like evidence that you are right or "winning" but it is not.

As for the woman featured in the OP, she has simply shown others her perspective of the actions taken as being seen in a negative light which is her opinion and is neither right or wrong. Others might not see it a she does but that has no bearing on whether it was true or false as that doesn't apply to opinions on anything.

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

What's a "femanazi"?

Oops! Feminazi.

Feminists, pro-choice activists, and progressive women.

Tom Hazlett a professor of economics at the University of California at Davis, coined the term to describe any female who is intolerant of any point of view that challenges militant feminism. I often use it to describe women who are obsessed with perpetuating a modern-day holocaust: abortion.

 

[Webster]

We know, we know. You like to circle jerk all over pictures of your most favuhrit cumservatives. Get onto posting with your next thread pissing and moaning about how one side is the main problem with this country.

Wow, tell us how ya' really feel, Dee...

 

[Dee]

Wow, tell us how ya' really feel, Dee...

I thought I just did!

 

[mrldii]

Oops! Feminazi.

Feminists, pro-choice activists, and progressive women.

Tom Hazlett a professor of economics at the University of California at Davis, coined the term to describe any female who is intolerant of any point of view that challenges militant feminism. I often use it to describe women who are obsessed with perpetuating a modern-day holocaust: abortion.

Oh. So, "a feminazi" is "a progressive woman", "a pro-choice activist", and/or "a feminist".

*Odd*. According to Mr. Merriam and Mr. Webster, a "feminist" is "someone [male OR female] who believes in the social, economic, and political equality of the sexes", and yet you've turned it into a bad thing. Hmmmm.


Are you sure you're not a closet Muslim?

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

Are you sure you're not a closet Muslim?

Very sure. Today's feminists on the otherhand are like radical Muslim's. They don't want equal rights they want special rights just for them. They don't appreciate all INNOCENT life but instead treat that innocent unborn human life like a radical Muslim treats women as a disposable nuisance. It's no wonder they don't speak out against the treatment of women in that region.

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

I have a few questions; Why should you need a reason to be kind to someone? Shouldn't you just be kind to someone because that's just your nature?

Sure.


Why should they have to agree with you on politics before being kind to them?

In the world where we actually meet people all day you more then likely don't know unless you are driving behind me then you get a good idea what I believe. But it matters so I know if I should waste my time with them.

Why should it matter if they respond to your kindness with hostility or kindness?

So I can know if I should waste a single second on them.



How does their response to your kindness effect whether it was right or wrong to be kind?

Because he could have passed on his kindness to someone who actually appreciates the gesture instead of some racist bitch.

What makes you think your thoughts or ideas on anything will ever even be remotely considered if you respond to one person's hostility with some of your own?

Don't care, and if that is a persons response I really have no desire to even try. Many others with better character out there who you could devote time to.

Wouldn't the likely outcome that they would become less willing not more willing to even consider you if you intend to throw back what you get.

Again who cares to even try with such a waste of skin.

Here's a thought, let's dump all these labels and start looking at people as people and not through the lens of made up labels which obscure the value of others and make discussing the issues of the day harder then they need to be.

Except the labels fit like a well tailored suit more often then not.

One last thing, the more I see threads like this, the harder it will be for others to even be willing to consider anything said in them because the people in question have shown repeatedly that they have no interest in considering anything that isn't centered around their beliefs so it's pointless to reply to them as they will outright refuse to consider other people's thoughts and therefore prevent any meaningful discussion from occurring. This may sound like evidence that you are right or "winning" but it is not.

As for the woman featured in the OP, she has simply shown others her perspective of the actions taken as being seen in a negative light which is her opinion and is neither right or wrong.

It most certainly is wrong, disgusting and filled with hate that somehow all those evil white people are haters. And now I need to run and get my duct tape so my head does not explode.

Others might not see it a she does but that has no bearing on whether it was true or false as that doesn't apply to opinions on anything.

Duct tape! Where is my duct tape!