What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

SCOTUS Restricts Authority of EPA To Regulate Climate Issues

Webster

Retired Snark Master
Administrator
Joined
May 11, 2013
Posts
25,470
OT Bucks
69,076
(The Guardian) Supreme Court limits federal power to regulate carbon emissions
The Supreme Court on Thursday sharply curbed the federal government’s authority to limit carbon emissions from existing power plants, dealing a major blow to the administration’s climate goals.

In a 6-3 ruling, the court’s conservative supermajority sided with conservative states and fossil fuel companies in a move that will hobble efforts to move the US away from coal-burning power plants and toward sources of renewable energy.

The decision will have “profound implications for the government’s overall regulatory power” and will “seriously hinder America’s ability to stave off disastrous global heating,” writes Oliver Milman, the Guardian’s environment reporter. Here’s more from Oliver: The case, which was backed by a host of other Republican-led states including Texas and Kentucky, was highly unusual in that it was based upon the Clean Power Plan, an Obama-era strategy to cut emissions from coal-fired power plants that never came into effect. The Biden administration sought to have the case dismissed as baseless given the plan was dropped and has not been resurrected.

Not only was this case about a regulation that does not exist, that never took effect, and which would have imposed obligations on the energy sector that it would have met regardless. It also involves two legal doctrines that are not mentioned in the constitution, and that most scholars agree have no basis in any federal statute.

However, the supreme court has sided with West Virginia, a major coal mining state, which argued that “unelected bureaucrats” at the EPA should not be allowed to reshape its economy by limiting pollution – even though emissions from coal are helping cause worsening flooding, heatwaves and droughts around the world, as well as killing millions of people through toxic air.

It is the most important climate change case to come before the supreme court in more than a decade.

-Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...tricts-federal-power-greenhouse-gas-emissions
 
Remember the CDC's "eviction moratorium" and how SCOTUS spanked them for over-stepping their legislative bounds?

Same thing here.
 
I don’t want dirty air, dirty water but people are so ignorant about the modern day coal plants in 1st world countries that virtually release no pollution. If they want to do some good stop buying communist China products that put no pollution control in any of their power plants. You want to make a difference for a cleaner world pay extra for for American made and Democratic made products. It can be done we’ve been doing it in our household since China killed millions around the world with this little virus that has affected people.
 
Back
Top Bottom