Smooth said:
They take jobs away from people. The unemployment rate in my state is the highest in the country so I'm not a fan of these things.
This. I just read an article about McDonald's replacing employees with machines, and A LOT of people commented about how much they were so excited because they "didn't have to deal with horrid customer service workers". I understand this in some cases, but not every customer service employee is a horrid person who either treats you like shit or is too chirpy and friendly.
I work in retail, and we are trained to get a read on the customer as we're interacting with them. If they're chatty, we chat back. If they're not very vocal and seemingly want to get through the transactions, I only really ask the pertinent questions (eg. about receipts, whether they want a bag, etc). It's not difficult to determine what the customer wants and doesn't want, so I think a lot of people are just being extremely anti-social and or overly dramatic.
And to be honest, it frightens me to think that a lot of people don't respect or see the need for customer service positions. Many people I come across feel they need to be replaced with machines, to take that "nagging, annoying cashier, hostess, waitress, call center..." jerk out of the picture and risk cutting millions of jobs. Sure, if this was the case, it would most likely be implemented slowly and in increments, but I think that we DO need to keep those positions instead of just bringing in a machine to do it.
While I understand the theory of wanting to streamline technology and make it more efficient for customers, to ring out more people and thus make more money, I feel we're getting rid of some truly crucial jobs that rely on customer service that a machine simply cannot provide.