- Joined
- Jan 9, 2010
- Posts
- 2,437
- Reaction score
- 28
- Points
- 1,525
I was reading through the article Why would anyone believe in the "Islamophobia Industry"? when I came across a certain point that I have heard people try to make before. I've just never seen it attributed to Dickie Dawkins. ![Stick out tongue :P :P](/images/smilies/tongue.png)
Though, the main problem I have is between what he says and the reality. People don't simply choose to 'leave it or join it'. Many people choose to throw (metaphoric) stones from the sidelines and be generally discriminatory in a way that comes from the same place as racism. It may not strictly speaking be racism. But it's still bigotry.
Kind of how in the same way agism, sexism etc. are not racist. But are they not bigoted and discriminatory, therefore unacceptable in the same manner?
Alhamdulillah. I've been very lucky. I have only had a few run ins, online and in person with Islamophobes. A few comments in person, when dressed in Islamic clothing - the worst of it wasn't too bad, when I was getting cash out at an ATM and a couple of teenagers were riding their bikes past, then turned around, came back and screamed some incoherent nonsense at me.
By the same token, online I've had a few death threats on the basis of my religion.
Oh, and this lovely message in my Facebook inbox yesterday evening (read at your own discretion, it is quite gross):
I was just wondering. Do you agree with Richard Dawkin's assertion, or while not necessarily strictly speaking 'racist', do you agree with me that being bigoted in this manner is no better at all and absolutely inexcusable?
![Stick out tongue :P :P](/images/smilies/tongue.png)
And I understand that. Islam is a religion and not a race, therefore you cannot be racist against it.High profile names such as the atheist Richard Dawkins have said that racism against a religion cannot exist (“It is not a race… Islam is a religion and you can choose to leave it or join it”).
Though, the main problem I have is between what he says and the reality. People don't simply choose to 'leave it or join it'. Many people choose to throw (metaphoric) stones from the sidelines and be generally discriminatory in a way that comes from the same place as racism. It may not strictly speaking be racism. But it's still bigotry.
Kind of how in the same way agism, sexism etc. are not racist. But are they not bigoted and discriminatory, therefore unacceptable in the same manner?
Alhamdulillah. I've been very lucky. I have only had a few run ins, online and in person with Islamophobes. A few comments in person, when dressed in Islamic clothing - the worst of it wasn't too bad, when I was getting cash out at an ATM and a couple of teenagers were riding their bikes past, then turned around, came back and screamed some incoherent nonsense at me.
By the same token, online I've had a few death threats on the basis of my religion.
Oh, and this lovely message in my Facebook inbox yesterday evening (read at your own discretion, it is quite gross):
(To clarify, in the single preceding reply I sent this clown, I did say he had a bad case of 'little dick syndrome.')wow all these days at work and i didn't need to be there i could have just been a welfare cheat like you muslims. You social retard. You'd know all about little dicks wouldn't you being a muslims. Hahha the reason muslims are so angry and treat woman the way they do is they want to have big white Aussie cock. Not a little pin dick like all muslims have lol the reason they all have little dicks is Muhammad rapped so many woman that his little dick gene spread through Islam. Hahahah
I was just wondering. Do you agree with Richard Dawkin's assertion, or while not necessarily strictly speaking 'racist', do you agree with me that being bigoted in this manner is no better at all and absolutely inexcusable?