What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Tattooist slammed for inking pet dog

Jazzy

Wild Thing
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
79,918
OT Bucks
308,876
A New York tattoo artist has been slammed after inking his dog with a heart and his wife's name while it was still under anaesthetic following surgery.

Mistah Metro posted an image on Instagram of his pet lying sedated with a heart-shaped tattoo with an arrow through it and a ribbon around it reading 'Alex' and 'Mel'.

tattoo__instagram.jpg


Alongside the picture the artist wrote: "One of the many reasons my dog is cooler than yours!

"She had her spleen removed today and the vet let me tattoo her while she was under. #dogs"

The artwork was inked on the right shoulder of brown and white pit-bull mix, whose name is Zion.

The tattoo led to a ferocious backlash online, with animal lovers condemning Metro, who works for American reality NY Ink star Chris Torres.

Although it is not illegal to tattoo a dog, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) condemned the move.

"Tattooing an animal for the vain sake of joy and entertainment of the owner without any regard for the well-being of the animal is not something the ASPCA supports," said a ASPCA spokesman.

The vet who allowed the tattoo has not been identified. The picture was initially republished on website Gothamist, triggering an avalanche of complaints.

Many Twitter users were appalled by the tattoo, calling for the dog to be taken away from his owner.

Source

What do you think about what he did?
 
I don't see what's the big deal...there was a doctor present who permitted it and the dog was sedated... how is that any different from dying your dogs fur? Essentially.
 
"Tattooing an animal for the vain sake of joy and entertainment of the owner without any regard for the well-being of the animal is not something the ASPCA supports," said a ASPCA spokesman.

I disagree with the part I bolded. While I don't like or agree with tattooing dogs, the dog was totally sedated and in the company of a vet and his/her staff. If the man who did this had no regard for the well-being of his dog, he would not have had the dogs spleen removed. This operation must have been very expensive but yet, for the well-being of his dog he had it done.
 
I bet the dog didn't feel a thing. No harm done I guess.
 
Back
Top Bottom