What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Teen sexter convicted for child porn

Jazzy

Wild Thing
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
79,918
OT Bucks
308,926
A teenager in Canada has been found guilty of possessing and disseminating child pornography after sending text messages containing naked images of her boyfriend's ex-girlfriend.

The teenager - who was aged 16 at the time of the offence - had been shown the photos by her boyfriend, then sent them to a friend.

The court heard her aim had been to humiliate and intimidate her victim.

The victim was of a similar age to the accused, which meant the images were deemed to be child pornography. The teenager was also charged with "uttering threats".

The judge in the case in Victoria, British Columbia, told CTV News that the messages were "mean, rude and antagonistic".

"The images in question come within the definition of child pornography."

The trial focused on three images and a handful of text messages that were shared between the accused, her friend, the boyfriend and the victim.

Christopher Mackie, the lawyer representing the teenager, said he would challenge the verdict on constitutional grounds.

He told the court that it was unconstitutional to charge youths who "sext" with child-pornography offences because it was legal for adults to text "erotic images".

"These child pornography laws were intended to protect children, not to persecute them", he told news organisation CBC. He said it was a "heavy hammer" to be using.

Source

Do you think she's guilty of child pornography? Why / Why not?
 
The trial focused on three images and a handful of text messages that were shared between the accused, her friend, the boyfriend and the victim.
Why isn't the boyfriend being charged too?
 
They're all guilty of extreme stupidity therefore they all need to be hit on the head by a whole baseball team. This includes the judge, the boyfriend, the friend and the victim as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom