What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

"The moral justification of capitalism lies in the fact that it is the only system

WHO IS SERAFIN

Platinum Member
Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Posts
7,080
OT Bucks
21,787
consonant with man's rational nature, that it protects man's survival qua man, and that its ruling principle is: justice."



In my business ethics course we always discuss the social context of business, particularly the implications of different social systems: the prevailing mixed economy, socialism, and capitalism. Initially, students do not have a clear understanding what capitalism means. They think that even some degree of freedom typical in the markets in North America, Europe, and many Asian countries qualifies as capitalism. However, they are wrong. Some degree of freedom does not qualify as capitalism, which is “a social system based on the recognition of individual rights (including property rights) in which all property is privately owned.” Such a system does not exist anywhere in the world today, although some mixed economies, such as Hong Kong and some other Asian countries have a higher degree of economic freedom than the rest.

The mixed economy, a mixture of freedom and controls, or capitalism and socialism, is the dominant social system today because it is widely perceived to be “the best of both worlds:”

READ THE REST HERE
http://capitalismmagazine.com/2015/03/capitalism-benefits-everyone/
 
*dusts off thread* So long as (a) someone's there to make sure the rules are enforced in as fair/equitable manner as possible and (b) everyone, from the highest to the lowest, have as equal a chance as possible at the proverbial brass ring.

Otherwise, its' all hokum bull :censored: what "Capitalism Magazine" wrote above.
 
*dusts off thread* So long as (a) someone's there to make sure the rules are enforced in as fair/equitable manner as possible and (b) everyone, from the highest to the lowest, have as equal a chance as possible at the proverbial brass ring.

Otherwise, its' all hokum bull :censored: what "Capitalism Magazine" wrote above.

It’s more about raising ethical society, you don’t do that no form of economy or government will work
 
It’s more about raising ethical society
And part of that involves (a) making sure there are some rules in place and (b) ensuring everyone has an equal shot at success.
 
Back
Top Bottom