What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

World War or World Hunger?

Which would you bring, if you could only bring one?

  • World Peace

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • End of world hunger

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Neither

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Scout

Dedicated Member
Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Posts
331
OT Bucks
1,120
Which would you end? You can only pick one.
wink.gif
 
This is a hard one. I'm looking solely on numbers on this, because both are equally bad. More people die of starvation than war. With just that, I voted world hunger.
 
Peace, 'cause it means they'll get their water, land, oil, etc. Which should help 'em solve the other problem... 'sides if they aren't fighting they'll lose their fighting skills making it easier...
 
World Peace because Im sure ending hunger will be easy to obtain after that.
tongue.gif
 
I'd bring world peace. As already said, once world peace is established, world hunger can be dealt to much easier.
 
Peace... Because once there is peace, then everything is all good - and being hungry causes unrest/unpeace (
tongue.gif
) so to attain peace, you must have everyone fed.
biggrin.gif
 
World peace, peaceful people would probably share their food.
 
I think that world hunger is dependent on world peace, so I voted for Peace.
 
Nebulous said:
World Peace because Im sure ending hunger will be easy to obtain after that.
tongue.gif

Exactly. Once peace is established, world hunger would most likely be taken care of.
 
Back
Top Bottom