Best couple of minutes on cnn since the 90s when truth and facts were last repeated.
Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
t the height of the British Empire, just after the First World War, an island smaller than Kansas controlled roughly a quarter of the world’s population and landmass. To the architects of this colossus, the largest empire in history, each conquest was a moral achievement. Imperial tutelage, often imparted through the barrel of an Enfield, was delivering benighted peoples from the errors of their ways—child marriage, widow immolation, headhunting. Among the edifiers was a Devonshire-born rector’s son named Henry Hugh Tudor. Hughie, as he was known to Winston Churchill and his other chums, pops up so reliably in colonial outposts with outsized body counts that his story can seem a “Where’s Waldo?” of empire.
He’s Churchill’s garrison-mate in Bangalore in 1895—a time of “messes and barbarism,” the future Prime Minister complained in a note to his mum. As the century turns, Tudor is battling Boers on the veldt; then it’s back to India, and on to occupied Egypt. Following a decorated stint as a smoke-screen artist in the trenches of the First World War, he’s in command of a gendarmerie, nicknamed Tudor’s Toughs, that opens fire in a Dublin stadium in 1920—an assault during a search for I.R.A. assassins which leaves dozens of civilians dead or wounded. Prime Minister David Lloyd George delights in rumors that Tudor’s Toughs were killing two Sinn Féinners for every murdered loyalist. Later, even the military’s chief of staff marvelled at how nonchalantly the men spoke of those killings, tallying them up as though they were runs in a cricket match; Tudor and his “scallywags” were out of control. It didn’t matter: Churchill, soon to be Secretary of State for the Colonies, had Tudor’s back.
Imperial subjects, of course, sometimes found their own solutions to such problems. A hard-line British field marshal, atop the I.R.A. hit list, was gunned down in Belgravia in 1922. Tudor, worried he would be next, made himself scarce. By the following year, he and his Irish paramilitaries were propagating their tactics for suppressing natives in the British-controlled Mandate of Palestine, Churchill having decided that the violence-prone Tudor was just the fellow to train the colonial police. A letter from Tudor to Churchill that I recently came across crystallizes all the insouciance, cynicism, greed, callousness, and errant judgment of empire. He opens by telling Churchill that he’s just commanded his troops to slaughter Adwan Bedouins who had been marching on Amman to protest high taxes levied on them by their notoriously extravagant emir. This tribe was “invariably friendly to Great Britain,” Tudor writes, a touch ruefully. But, he adds, “politics are not my affair.”
Tudor had cheery news to impart, too. Not only could the Mandate be a “wonderful tourist country,” but prospectors had discovered vast sums’ worth of potash in the Dead Sea valley. Should Britain appropriate the resources and increase the policing budget, its difficulties in the region would “smooth out,” he told Churchill, assuring him that Palestinians would be easier to pacify than the Irish: “They are a different people, and it’s unlikely that the Arab if handled firmly will ever do much more than agitate and talk.”...
Unless we deal with past wrongs, how can we deal with the present?Why aren't people as outraged about slavery going on right now as they are about what happened over 100 years ago?
Tell that to every subject group who suffered under British rule....
![]()
The British Empire Was Much Worse Than You Realize
The world’s biggest colonial power prided itself on being a liberal democracy. Was this part of the problem?www.newyorker.com
Queen Elizabeth II was a good and decent person but the British Empire she led at its' end has a couple hundred years worth of blood on its hands....
![]()
We need to start with reparations back 7000 years ago.😂
By dealing with themhow can we deal with the present?
By dealing with them![]()
I don't have it in me to hate anyone but I'll be damned if I'm giving anyone a pass for past actions; to me, "letting sleeping dogs lie" is as abominable a thought as what people used to do decades and centuries ago. If that means turning over every rock and letting the chips fall, fine.Why do you hate our ancient ancestors? Are you a ancestor racist? 🤔
100% a joke.I don't have it in me to hate anyone but I'll be damned if I'm giving anyone a pass for past actions; to me,
"letting sleeping dogs lie" is as abominable a thought as what people used to do decades and centuries ago.
If that means turning over every rock and letting the chips fall, fine.
Since he isn’t a racist just controversial unlike a current president who had several kkk members he liked to call friends, I’ll call certain UN-named people being hypocrites.And given your support for Donald Trump, you're in no position for talk about racism.
They're going to get their reparations and it'll be so glorious watch.
![]()