Kasynlie said:Having the family take part in such a decision (which is most likely to happen) can be an unbearable burden: many may resent a loved oneâs decision to die, and would be either emotionally scared or estranged by the prospect of being in any way involved with their death. Assisted suicide also introduces a new danger, that the terminally ill may be pressured into ending their lives by others who are not prepared to support them through their illness. Even the most well regulated system would have no real way to ensure that this did not happen.
Many may resent them? I doubt it, that decision is usually made at a point that the illness gets so bad that they don't have long time to live anymore. At that point the illness has been in the lives of the family members for long time, so they've already come to terms with the inevitable death of their loved one. It would be cruel for the family members to want the person to keep on suffering for those few months just because they don't want to lose them. But yeah sure, some might not agree with the decision, though it's not their life or their decision to make.
Even the most well regulated system would have no real way to ensure that this did not happen
You make that assumption based on what? It's a well regulated system that takes a lot of time over here. You don't go to the doctor one day and expect to die the same day. There have to be impartial witnesses, multiple doctors and psychologists involved.