What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

CAPTCHA?

Nebulous's iconNebulous

Founder of Off Topix
Elite Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Posts
82,870
OT Bucks
155,862
ht_google_recaptcha_02_mt_141203_16x9_992.jpg


http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/rise-machines-artificially-intelligent-computers-pass-captcha/story?id=27365340

Those distorted strings of letters and numbers you see on websites to prevent spam have instead proven to be more painful to humans than the robots the test, called CAPTCHA, is designed to block.

The moment Alan Turing, regarded as the father of modern computing, predicted is already here: The machines have risen -- and they keep getting smarter.


Google said its research shows that today's artificial intelligence technology can get past CAPTCHAs with 99.8 percent accuracy, rendering them no longer dependable for anything other than driving humans crazy.

The "Completely Automated Public Turing Test to Tell Computers and Humans Apart," or CAPTCHA for short, was named for Turing, who devised a test in 1950 asking if machines can think.

Anyone who has ever spent several attempts trying to type those barely legible strings of letters and numbers into a CAPTCHA to prove their status as a bona fide member of homo sapiens knows how frustrating they can be.

Google announced on Wednesday it is rolling out a simple one-click solution for websites that use its "No CAPTCHA" service to weed out spam from bots.

With the new experience, users will be able to simply check a box that reads: "I'm not a robot." Surprisingly, this could be the ticket (for now) for fending off the bots.

If the risk analysis back end still needs more convincing, the user may be redirected to a traditional CAPTCHA.

Alan Turing would likely be saying "I told you so," if he had lived to see 2014.

In June, a supercomputer posing as a 13-year-old boy named Eugene Goostman, became what is believed to be the first machine to pass the 65-year-old Turing Test.

Goostman pulled off the feat by successfully duping enough judges into believing they were conversing with a real human, according to the University of Reading, which organizes the annual test.

Thoughts?
 
The cat-and-mouse game between humans and machines continues.... *looks around* ...at least its' not Skynet...yet. :lol: :whistle: :whistle:
 
Wait, I know! CAPTCHAs aren't human-solvable therefore anyone who actually gets it right is a bot!
 
Evil Eye said:
Wait, I know! CAPTCHAs aren't human-solvable therefore anyone who actually gets it right is a bot!

Lol, yeah that makes sense. :P
 
Mr. Kringle said:
Evil Eye said:
Wait, I know! CAPTCHAs aren't human-solvable therefore anyone who actually gets it right is a bot!
Lol, yeah that makes sense. :P

:| ...isn't that what they want you to think? :ohmy:
 
Google have just brought out a new Captcha service which looks interesting: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/intro/index.html

It detects how you move your mouse to click the button (amongst other things) do detect your "humanness". If it works (and it looks as though it has done so far), then it should make the whole process a lot easier.
 
AndroidOS said:
Google have just brought out a new Captcha service which looks interesting: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/intro/index.html
Interesting indeed. Seems to be rather hard to get a somewhat more in-depth explanation of how it works though :(
 
Evil Eye said:
AndroidOS said:
Google have just brought out a new Captcha service which looks interesting: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/intro/index.html
Interesting indeed. Seems to be rather hard to get a somewhat more in-depth explanation of how it works though :(

Yeah, but in a way that's a good thing - it means the bot writer's have a harder time working out how to break it.
 
AndroidOS said:
Yeah, but in a way that's a good thing - it means the bot writer's have a harder time working out how to break it.
True, but it also makes it harder to trust.
 
Back
Top Bottom