Haha when I read the stupid titles that they put on these things I thought you might have actually found something. But really he has said nothing shocking. First of all what he said was true and has been a struggle since the very beginning, interpretation of this document, the constitution. Even in the very beginning there were disputes between almost everyone on how to interpret this document. In fact the first two political parties largely formed because of their divide on this issue (as well as the issue of federal govt. vs state govt.). The federalists sought a loose interpretation of the constitution, one that would allow for such things as a national bank (the federal reserve) as well as almost every other government program in place today. The Democratic-Republicans on the other hand were headed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and believed in a strict interpretation of the constitution. That mindset of following a strict interpretation has largely faded out of existence due to the impracticality of implementation. Following strictly what the document says wouldn't allow for a federal reserve, wouldn't even allow for congressional districts, the electoral college, judicial review (a widely accepted precedent established by John Marshall.. without it there would be no courts ruling things unconstitutional), jury of peers, marriage, the right to privacy and the right to vote (Full list:
http://www.usconstit...t/constnot.html).
Since the mindset that has been almost universally accepted has been a loose interpretation it becomes increasingly difficult to find a consensus on what the constitution is actually saying (what Ezra meant by confusing). Obviously none of the men who drafted the document are still around, so interpreting the constitution has become very challenging due to the subjective nature of doing so. He said it wouldn't really have an impact which is true, because everyone interprets the document differently and that is what congressmen have been acting on in the past, in the present and likely how they will continue to make legislative decisions in the future.
To me the people putting this out there seem to either not have watched the video, or are intentionally misinterpreting what he is saying for propaganda's sake simply because he didn't choose very good words to make his point.
Very reputable website you have there, I like this article headline that was linked to in the sidebar: The American Government Enables Worldwide Sharia by Censoring Critics of Radical Islam
